David Axelrod Spots a 'Hilarious Turn of Events' in TX Senate Race (and...
Just Another Dem-Funded Riot: A Signal Message Exposed the Organized Machine Behind NJ...
CNN’s Smerconish Torches Graham Platner: '18 Years of Nazi Tattoo Was a Daily...
When Will Talarico Formally Introduce Straight Cisgendered Men in Texas to His Friend...
Tom Steyer Wants Prosecutions After WH Meme Shows Aliens Being Put Back on...
DOJ Announces Rioter Who Threatened to Kill ICE Agent and His Family Is...
Illegal Alien Who Faked Being an Iowa Superintendent Sentenced to Two Years in...
Honeymoon Over: Democrats Turn on Their Own After Fetterman Podcast Appearance With Katie...
Daily Beast Hits Rock Bottom: Smears Sec. Duffy's Newborn Grandchild in Deranged TDS...
Talarico's Mystery Vegan Gal Pal: Ex-Chief of Staff, Gay Bar Dancer, and the...
Christians: Stop Equating Paxton's Personal Sins with Talarico's Outright Heresy
Jill Biden’s Family Image Rehab Tour Crumbles: Even Dems and Ex-Aides Aren’t Buying...
Cough Once and Suddenly You Hate Open-Air Drug Markets: Pratt's Epic New Video...
Platner’s Phony War Grievance: Volunteered for Combat, Ignored His Parents, Then Blamed Su...
What Happened to the Man Who Built CNN Should Terrify Every American Over...

'BUSTED': These journos may have just TORPEDOED media/Dem narrative about FBI texts

As Twitchy told you, the Mueller probe suffered yet another potentially fatal blow when damning anti-Trump text messages between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were revealed. Business Insider’s Natasha Bertrand, for one, seemed taken aback by the idea that the DOJ would share internal documents with reporters during an investigation:

Advertisement

More from Business Insider:

It is “highly unusual” for the DOJ to release correspondences that are the subject of an ongoing investigation to Congress, let alone to the press, a source on one of the congressional committees investigating Russia’s election interference told Business Insider on Wednesday.

The source emphasized that none of the leaks came from Capitol Hill, which obtained the texts from the DOJ separately on Tuesday.

“It’s appalling behavior by the department,” said Matthew Miller, a former DOJ spokesman. “This is an ongoing investigation in which these employees have due-process rights, and the political leadership at DOJ has thrown them to the wolves so Rosenstein can get credit from House Republicans at his hearing today.”

One source close to the process who requested anonymity to discuss internal DOJ deliberations said the texts were given to reporters in case they did not leak in time for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s public hearing on Wednesday morning.

“It is at least debatable whether it was appropriate to turn them over to the Hill in the middle of an ongoing investigation,” Miller said. “Under no circumstances was it appropriate to leak them to the press.”

Advertisement

Just how “appalling” is it, though? Because according to ABC News reporter Mike Levine, this sort of thing isn’t unprecedented:

Other reporters are backing up Levine’s on this:

Huh.

https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/941030499493011457

https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/941030799683538945

https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/941031254987767809

Advertisement

Good question. It’s almost as if media are OK with leaks when Democrats benefit. But that couldn’t be right, could it?

***

Related:

‘Clown show’! NYT spin on hearing about FBI agents’ anti-Trump texts looks familiar

WATCH: Trey Gowdy goes OFF during hearing on FBI agents’ anti-Trump texts

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos