Wasteful Spending Alert! Rep. Nancy Mace Spots Possible Reason They Put 'Plus' at...
Mocking O'Malley: Former Social Security Head Laughs at Elon Musk and DOGE Labeling...
Sean Hannity Interview Has Viewers Likening President Donald Trump and Elon Musk to...
Donald the Disrupter: MAGA Loves That Democrat Hakeem Jeffries Nicknamed Trump ‘Captain Ch...
Jasmine Crockett Is Mad Her Fellow Democrats Underestimated How Selfish and Satanic Voters...
Musk Is the Executive Order Enforcer and Trump’s Impressed with DOGE’s 100 T-Shirted...
Mollie Hemingway: DOGE Raging Against an Unconstitutional ‘Fourth Branch’ of Government
Unteachable Moment: Stephen Miller Schools CNN Anchor on DOGE but She’s Unwilling to...
CNN Anchor Upset Over DOGE Nuclear Firings Didn’t Know Sam Brinton Stole Women’s...
Dollar Figures of Speech: Kamala Harris Signs with Hollywood Talent Agency to Deliver...
Journo Tells of the Anti-Woke Diagnosis in the Midst of a Civil Rights...
Biden’s HHS Spent More Than $10 Billion on Illegal Immigrants in One Year
Sen. Mike Lee Blasts Volodymyr Zelenskyy Who Says He No Longer Feels Supported...
CNN Links String of Plane Accidents to Trump Cutting FAA Safety Specialists
Wait! Protests Don't Work? Leftwing Activist Podcaster Whines NYC Anti-Trump Protestors Sh...

DCCC Chair's first statement on Rittenhouse verdict contains bald-faced lies about Jacob Blake (and the 'corrected version' is still hot garbage)

As one might expect, DCCC Chair Sean Patrick Maloney is outraged by the Kyle Rittenhouse not-guilty verdict. And that’s his prerogative, of course.

What we’re decidedly less OK with is that his condemnation of the verdict relies heavily on bald-faced lies about Jacob Blake, in whose name the Kenosha riots occurred:

Advertisement

Anyone see a problem with Maloney’s statement? Because there are at least two glaring ones:

It’s hot garbage, is what it is.

Even Dave Weigel thinks Maloney needs to slow his roll:

And Charlie Sykes, of all people!

Advertisement

That’s how you know you’ve really messed up.

And when you’ve really messed up, you issue a corrected statement. That’s what you’re supposed to do.

So that’s what the DCCC did:

Guess the DCCC still doesn’t see a need to correct their initial statement that Jacob Blake was unarmed. They’re just going to ignore it completely. Just like they’re going to ignore that they initially painted him as a murder victim.

As “corrected versions” go, this one’s pretty terrible.

Advertisement

As always, DCCC!

It’s technically possible that they didn’t know the actual facts. But the more likely explanation is that they were counting on the people who read it not to know the actual facts.

That’s all they ever wanted from the Kyle Rittenhouse case: a racial weapon.

***

Related:

‘Well, there goes my earlier praise’: We should’ve known better than to think that Joe Biden would stand by his initial statement on Kyle Rittenhouse

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement