Last month, Georgia GOP Senate candidate Kelly Loeffler’s campaign put out an ad that highlighted, among other things, her Democratic opponent Raphael Warnock’s defense of Jeremiah Wright:
Well, the Washington Post’s Fact Checker Glenn Kessler has finally gotten around to fact-checking the ad, and you’ll no doubt be shocked at his findings:
Fact Checker: Loeffler’s bogus claim that Warnock "celebrated anti-American hatred" https://t.co/TkJJINQamO
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) December 3, 2020
And Kessler’s verdict is … three Pinocchios:
In his appearances, Warnock certainly tried to put Wright’s comments in context and suggested people read the whole sermon, not just watch the controversial snippet that appeared in a loop on cable television. But it’s a stretch to say that he defended hatred or “celebrated anti-American hatred.” He also had nothing to do with the decision to give Wright an award.
Moreover, regular readers know we frown on attack ads that rely on out-of-context video clips. Warnock’s comments on Wright were much more nuanced than snippets suggest. The Loeffler campaign earns Three Pinocchios.
When was the last time you saw WaPo frown on a Democratic attack ad that relied on out-of-context video clips?
Kessler doesn’t want you to believe your own lying ears.
https://twitter.com/Nick__Conklin/status/1334499629497520132
I mean…he clearly did. https://t.co/WWHWqHpyZa
— kaitlin, rino attention seeking whore (@thefactualprep) December 3, 2020
This ruling makes little sense based on your criteria for Pinocchios @GlennKesslerWP
Your fact-check is based on lacking context, not factual errors or contradictions. Unless you’re arguing that the charges in the ad were technically correct but taken out of context. pic.twitter.com/JGozYASICj
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) December 3, 2020
But it does make sense based on the Washington Post’s approach to journalism.
"But it’s a stretch to say that he defended hatred or 'celebrated anti-American hatred.'"
He was specifically tasked with defending Wright and his comments, which he did. 3 Pinocchios for something he did on video makes no sense. It's a disservice to voters who deserve answers.
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) December 3, 2020
We all saw it. We all heard it. The “context” doesn’t absolve Warnock of what Loeffler’s campaign has accused.
What a terrible week for fact-checking.
Shorter WaPo: “Yes, he did all the things they described in the ad. But 3 Pinocchio’s for not including the Democrat spin that came after.” https://t.co/ccbriLpOn2
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) December 3, 2020
One of the most fascinating things is Warnock has been given a dozen chances to distance himself from Rev Wright and his comments (the way Obama did). He has refused.
Wright said America deserved 9/11, and Warnock said he’s a prophet.
And WaPo says that can’t be questioned.
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) December 3, 2020
Because Democracy Dies in Darkness or something.
Frankly, your headline is missing context……..that’s not fact checking, that’s opposition spin.
— Auntie Alice 朱姨姨 (@AuntieAliceCY) December 3, 2020
The fact check has basically become the contextualizer for telling you that what you see is not what you're seeing https://t.co/jt5oy8ZfHF
— MicDre (@dremicdre) December 3, 2020
***
Related:
‘Missing context’ part 2: USA Today fact check tries to rescue Democrat Covid guideline hypocrites
Join the conversation as a VIP Member