Woke Preacher Explains How Drag is Holy
Biden Simp Victor Shi Meets 'National Treasure' Anthony Fauci
The White House Correspondents' Dinner aka 'Nerd Prom' is as Obnoxious as You...
'We Don't Like White People': Here Are Some Highlights From the Pro-Hamas Protests
Columbia Says It Won't Be Calling the NYPD to Handle Campus Protests Again
Sanctimonious Gavin Newsom Tries to Join in on Noem Ridicule but Gets Promptly...
Dana Loesch Asks Who Was Worse: Jimmy Carter or Joe Biden?
NBC News: White House Planning to Limit Biden's and Harris' Commencement Appearances
Gov. Kristie Noem Says to Preorder Her Book Where She Recounts Shooting Her...
LOL at Arizona State University Lawbreakers: Why Are the Police Letting Frat Boys...
President Biden Blasts 'Hateful Rhetoric' From Pro-Israel Demonstrators at Columbia
Alarming: Fire Marshal Jamaal Bowman Hilariously Duped by Pro-Hamas Twitter Parody Account
'Absolutely Incredible!' Julie Kelly Shares Unsealed Detail From Trump 'Classified Doc' Ca...
President Joe Biden Promises He Will Not Rest Until All American Hostages Are...
Trump-Hating Psychiatrist Proves She Needs a Civics Course While Opining About SCOTUS

Talk about problematic! Carlos Maza's reaping the whirlwind and crying foul after being forced to play by his own rules

Despite unveiling their latest set of hard-and-fast safety guidelines, Twitter still doesn’t seem to have taken any action to deplatform serial guideline violator Carlos Maza. Apparently his calls for violence aren’t enough to land him on their radar. Will this?

Advertisement

Oh, my.

We’re very curious. Because what it sounds like is hate speech. We know hate speech hasn’t been clearly defined by anyone yet, but we’re pretty sure that tweet is probably definitely hate speech.

Well, things were different back in 2014. Now that safety is Twitter’s top priority, though, they should really get on Maza already. His tweet was literally indefensible.

Advertisement

That’s great that he was defending you, Hannah, but as we all know, when it comes to policing alleged “hate speech,” context doesn’t matter.

He engaged in behavior that disrupted our experience on Twitter. Because we said so. Yes, that rule is vague, but we feel like it applies here. Because we said so.

Sorry, Carlos, we couldn’t hear you over the sound of our tiny violins.

Advertisement

We all know that Carlos doesn’t like to give people the benefit of the doubt before calling for them to be deplatformed … so why should we cut him slack on this?

https://twitter.com/bob_malak/status/1136718535030296576

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement