Rolling Stone: The Next President Must Vow to Restore the White House to...
‘Compassionate Caregiver’ in Florida Faces Firestorm for Gloating Over Charlie Kirk’s Assa...
CBS News: Did Two Million Germans Just Vote to Put Neo-Nazis in Power?
Marriage, Motherhood, and a Voucher From Day One
Jamie Raskin Says ‘Nobody Supports Hamas’ After Being Shown a Clip of Hasan...
Gee, Why Did Ilhan Omar Turn Off the Replies for This Labor Day...
Ted Lieu Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About What Must Be a...
BOOHOO! Susan Sarandon Says She's Losing Roles Because She Supports Palestine (Blaming Isr...
HAAAAA! X User Asked for the Worst Tweet Ever — X Delivered 5.6M...
Socialism 2026: Silly Socialists Spewing Solipsistic Sludge
How Hard Did Trump Laugh at Mark Kelly LASHING Out at Him in...
American Heroes of 9/11: Todd Beamer and the Passengers of Flight 93
James Talarico Just Went Full Hillary 2016 (and Hopefully With the Same Election...
Democrats RUSH to CONDEMN Attack on Amy Acton … There's Just a Few...
Well, Well, WELL: DataRepublican Thread-Drops Receipts on Anti-Trump VoteVets – GUESS Who...

Talk about problematic! Carlos Maza's reaping the whirlwind and crying foul after being forced to play by his own rules

Despite unveiling their latest set of hard-and-fast safety guidelines, Twitter still doesn’t seem to have taken any action to deplatform serial guideline violator Carlos Maza. Apparently his calls for violence aren’t enough to land him on their radar. Will this?

Advertisement

Oh, my.

We’re very curious. Because what it sounds like is hate speech. We know hate speech hasn’t been clearly defined by anyone yet, but we’re pretty sure that tweet is probably definitely hate speech.

Well, things were different back in 2014. Now that safety is Twitter’s top priority, though, they should really get on Maza already. His tweet was literally indefensible.

Advertisement

That’s great that he was defending you, Hannah, but as we all know, when it comes to policing alleged “hate speech,” context doesn’t matter.

He engaged in behavior that disrupted our experience on Twitter. Because we said so. Yes, that rule is vague, but we feel like it applies here. Because we said so.

Sorry, Carlos, we couldn’t hear you over the sound of our tiny violins.

Advertisement

We all know that Carlos doesn’t like to give people the benefit of the doubt before calling for them to be deplatformed … so why should we cut him slack on this?

https://twitter.com/bob_malak/status/1136718535030296576

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement