Jim Acosta Didn't Like Greg Gutfeld's Reality Check About Colbert's Cancellation (Replies...
Remember When Colbert Liked Trump (and Why)? Wow, Did THAT Backfire
Sen. Chris Murphy Did NOT Think Trump's Farewell to Colbert was Funny (He...
President Trump Flexes His Political Muscle in GOP Primaries
Greg Gutfeld and Clay Travis Spot a Reason Colbert Might Have Gotten Canceled...
Propaganda Performer: Democrats Thank Stephen Colbert Online for His Years of Service to...
Let's Compare Other Late-Night Hosts' Finale Viewership to Numbers Colbert's Media Fans Ar...
Trump Trolls Colbert with Hilarious AI Video of Throwing Him in the Dumpster
Tulsi Leaves DNI Role to Care for Husband Abraham — A Heartwarming Example...
The Snake Emerges: Adam Schiff's Heartless Jab at Tulsi Amid Her Husband's Cancer...
POPCORN! FCC Chair Brendan Carr Asks for Public Comment About ABC's 'Bona Fide...
Moan of ‘Arc’: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Has ‘Grave’ Concerns About Trump’s America 250...
Reuters Gets Shredded for Anon 'Person Familiar With the Matter' Spin on Tulsi...
Power Hungry: Wasserman Schultz Invades Majority-Black District After Redistricting Wipes...
Rep. Thanedar Slammed as Disgusting and Vile for Attacking Tulsi Gabbard While Her...

'WTF do you people want!?' Cosmopolitan apparently has a major problem with 'public displays of dad-ing'

It’s fine — and understandable — if you’re not actually all that interested in wall-to-wall coverage of the Royal Baby, but Cosmopolitan seems actively hostile about it. Because apparently dads publicly showing pride in and affection for their children is super-annoying and stuff:

Advertisement

Rosa Heyman writes:

To recap: Prince Harry has so far commended his wife on giving birth to a human child, and he’s also held his own bb spawn in front of a camera. I get it. Royal babies are so cute! So exciting! Cheeks!

But. Isn’t it sort of sad that these displays of parenting—but really, of being a dad—are still so unexpected and noteworthy that they inspire this much attention?Mothering, on the other hand, remains invisible. (Not to mention, expected.) That is, unless you dare to stray from the classic mom playbook—or god forbid, make a mistake—then the force of a thousand judgmental tweetstorms will land in your mentions overnight.

But you don’t need me to remind you of our painful reality. If you’re a woman, you’re probably well-aware of the loads of research that focuses on the sacrifices that women across economic spectrums make for their careers in order to rear children. Hell, you might have even experienced all of this personally. (By the way, none of this even begins to address how society views and treats queer and transgender parents, but that’s a whole other rant for another day.)

Listen, I don’t mean to sound all curmudgeon-y like, IDK, this guy. Prince Harry’s happy exhibits of fatherhood also spark joy in me. I’m sure he’s already a great dad and a supportive husband. And furthermore, I understand that these gestures, while largely symbolic, are important signifiers of how Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are trying to modernize the monarchy. But come on, people—let’s expect more.

Advertisement

Leave it to a woke feminist to crap on fatherhood — and be completely wrong while doing so. Mothering does not, in fact, “remain invisible,” and sneering at proud fathers serves no purpose other than demonstrating that feminists’ reputation as shrill, bitter man-haters is pretty well deserved. Well, that and getting ratio’d:

That’s well deserved, too.

A lot of people sure seem to take issue with Cosmo’s sh*t opinion, yes:

Advertisement

Enough of this garbage already.

Advertisement

What a novel idea.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos