BOMBSHELL Study: Trans Ideology Fans More Likely to Back Violence — Including Killing...
Kentucky Fried Nightmare?: China KFCs Add Chicken Sandwich With Oreo Cookie-Style Bun to...
Jon Favreau Tries to Contain Backfire for El-Sayed With a 'Stop Talking About...
Judge Lifts Her Nationwide Block on Trump's Mail-In Ballot Executive Order After SCOTUS...
We Have Lost Too Many Legends — but a First-Of-Its-Kind Pill Just Gave...
El-Sayed's Latest Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Streamer in California' Is Failing...
American Heroes of 9/11: Rick Rescorla
Appeals Court Tosses Rep. LaMonica McIver's Claim of Legislative Immunity
Here Are Details About the Arrested 'Father' This NM Dem Didn't Mention While...
Taylor Lorenz: Queen of Cancel Culture & Leopards Eating Faces Party Founder Discovers...
Lunatic District Attorney Vows to 'Blow Up' White House Ballroom
Dana Loesch’s Bold Fix: Stuff Near-80 Icons in Giant Koozies Before We Lose...
Chris Murphy Finally Remembers the State He's Supposed to Represent (Just Not the...
Mike Rogers Nukes Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From yet ANOTHER Issue
Can't Help but Notice What Abdul El-Sayed Does NOT Do When Responding to...

'OUTRAGEOUS'! MGM Resorts' latest response to Las Vegas shooting sparks new 'PR NIGHTMARE'

As we approach the first anniversary of the deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas, killer Stephen Paddock’s motives remain as much a mystery as ever.

And speaking of mysterious motives, MGM Resorts International, which owns Mandalay Bay and the venue where the shooting occurred, is pre-emptively suing the survivors in the hopes of staving off future lawsuits against themselves:

Advertisement

The company, which owns Mandalay Bay and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue, argues that it cannot be held liable for Oct. 1 deaths, injuries or other damages, adding that any claims against MGM parties “must be dismissed,” according to complaints filed Friday in Nevada and California.

MGM is a Nevada company, so any lawsuits belong in state court, [Las Vegas attorney Robert] Eglet said. He viewed the decision to file the complaints in federal court as a “blatant display of judge shopping” that “quite frankly verges on unethical.”

“I’ve never seen a more outrageous thing, where they sue the victims in an effort to find a judge they like,” he said. “It’s just really sad that they would stoop to this level.”

It’s hard to argue with that assessment.

https://twitter.com/ConexAlway/status/1019219415731261440

Advertisement

Optics don’t get much worse than this.

https://twitter.com/nathantimmel/status/1019236619566673920

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement