Hilarious Community Note on Brigitte Gabriel Post Also Shows the Absolute State of...
And YOU'RE Paying! Thread Shows FREEBIES Biden Is Giving Illegals and It's SO...
HA! Megyn Kelly Rubs Salt in Sunny Hostin's WOUND After Coleman Hughes Chewed...
Karine Jean-Pierre Did NOT Want the Press Recording Obama's Media Pep Rally Aboard...
How Do States Further Residents’ 2A Rights Once Constitutional Carry Is Passed?
Horde of Anti-Israel Mouth-Breathing Douchenozzels Disrupts Holocaust Remembrance Day Meet...
Time Again to Play 'NBC News Story or Biden White House Press Release?'
Take the L! Jon Stewart's Attempt at Damage Control After Being Caught Doing...
She SO MAD! LOL! Jim Jordan Dares to Hold Fani Wilis ACCOUNTABLE and...
By DESIGN: Sen. John Kennedy Is Straight-FIRE Going OFF on Biden and Dems...
WATCH: Sonny Hostin's Attempt to Steamroll Coleman Hughes on The View Blows Up...
'It's Really That Bad'! Desperate Biden Campaign Calls in Reinforcements
Here's What Michigan's 'Newcomer Rental Subsidy' Program Entails (How Many Will Whitmer Ta...
Liz 'Fauxcahontas' Warren Out to Save You Heap Big Wampum -- Fight Shrinkflation
Ilhan Omar's Victory Lap Over Earmarks for Squad Members' Districts Goes Over Like...

WHOOPS! Judge's ruling on Donald Trump's Twitter account could open up a YUGE can of worms

Is there any doubt that we live in stupid times? Yes? Well, then this ought to put that doubt to rest:

Advertisement

More from Bloomberg:

The judge said the comment section of Trump’s personal account, @realDonaldTrump, is a public forum and that blocking users on the basis of political speech is a violation of their free-speech rights under the First Amendment.

U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan issued the ruling Wednesday in a lawsuit brought by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University on behalf of seven Twitter users who were blocked by Trump after replying to his tweets.
 “This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, ’block’ a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States,” Buchwald said. “The answer to both questions is no.”

Mkay …

Advertisement

No, it stems from the fact that it’s a stupid ruling.

Sounds about right.

It’s almost as if this was a stupid ruling. A stupid ruling that may wind up creating more problems than it solves.

https://twitter.com/sevenlayercake/status/999354777908719616

https://twitter.com/Ornery_Opinions/status/999344077383417856

Advertisement

Guess not!

This is fun, isn’t it?

https://twitter.com/Moj_kobe/status/999338899502649344

https://twitter.com/AuldenGhostley/status/999339296564891648

Where do we sign up? We want in on that action!

Advertisement

Buckle up!

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text and tweets.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement