Stay classy, New York Times:
No violence in the West Bank. No violence in Jordan. No protests in the Arab Street. Only Hamas. Only a terrorist group that urged its militants to attack Israel. Terrorists who refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist. And this is how the NYT covers it. Shame. pic.twitter.com/5UFHiPP8va
— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) May 15, 2018
It’s almost like the NYT is siding with Hamas.
Hrm.
Interesting how Israel seems to be the only country not allowed to defend its borders … well, except for the United States but that’s another story.
https://twitter.com/MichaelAKoplen/status/996408737689669633
Sadly yes, they are serious.
@nytimes sides with the terrorists. Pretty obvious.
— JWF (@JammieWF) May 15, 2018
It’s pretty damn obnoxious, right?
Odd…where did all of that billowing black smoke come from and why is it there?
— Never Give Up… (@PCGalloway) May 15, 2018
Well, clearly that’s completely Israel’s fault.
Duh.
Excellent point and perspective on yesterday, the tragedy of which the American media missed and distorted. Predictably so.
— Philbert (@pcgstl) May 15, 2018
Those poor demonstrators with their Molotov cocktails and knives.
And that's why we call it "fake news" @nytimes
— Becky (@ReformedLib928) May 15, 2018
They just keep living up to their name, don’t they?
LOL … Imagine the NYT publishing this headline after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor: 'AMERICANS KILL DOZENS IN PEAL HARBOR.'
Technically accurate but intellectually dishonest and misleading.
— Deplorable John ❌ (@JohnGAR911) May 15, 2018
And curtain.
Related:
OH BOY! David Hogg asks why Congress doesn’t have clear backpacks, SLAMS Broward County by mistake
WTAF?! Blue-check dbag you’ve never heard of writes NASTY obit for Melania Trump after surgery
INCOMING! Chelsea Handler goes after Nikki Haley about Hamas and HOLY SH*T, talk about BACKFIRE
Join the conversation as a VIP Member