Just. No.
What ‘Snowflakes’ Get Right About Free Speech – The New York Times https://t.co/DNmbfLZ9vw
— ?Imani Gandied Yams? (@AngryBlackLady) April 24, 2017
So much no. Anybody who tries to silence someone else because their ideas and opinions hurt their feelings is getting nothing right about free speech.
These people should not not collect $200, they do not pass go …
From The New York Times:
We should thank the student protesters, the activists in Black Lives Matter and other “overly sensitive” souls for keeping watch over the soul of our republic.
Dude.
https://twitter.com/wokieleaks1/status/856495773973962752
https://twitter.com/wokieleaks1/status/856528878239719424
Gold star for spelling bourgeois correctly.
And spot on.
https://twitter.com/Patrick_Hargis/status/856529048520073218
It does, it doesn’t, and they should. https://t.co/edK65lkyfC pic.twitter.com/xSMe021j09
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) April 24, 2017
How could one person get so many things wrong in one piece? Oh wait, the writer does say they’re a professor … never mind.
https://twitter.com/michaelbuddy/status/856516026049196033
Because free speech is mean!
Clearly it’s far easier to let them control how we think, what we believe and what we say. *eye roll*
https://twitter.com/wokieleaks1/status/856528553856421888
EL OH EL.
Related:
'Leftist socialist who hates Donald Trump and frogs' explains why it's OK to hate on Chelsea Clinton https://t.co/G1xy6Ki4Wv
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 24, 2017