CRAPTACULAR. Hillary's 'historic' speech at the #DNCInPHL left Ben Shapiro and others less than impressed

For being a supposed historic speech, Hillary Clinton left the majority of Americans feeling a bit … underwhelmed. She came off as robotic, practiced and insincere – that and the possibility the lifeblood of 34 virgins sustains her:

I almost cannot believe she is this bad at this. No wonder it took her 9,763 years and the lifeblood of 34 virgins to get her to this point.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) July 29, 2016

I'm so thankful for Twitter so I can read it instead of listening to @HillaryClinton @benshapiro #DemsInPhilly

— Susan Sims (@SusanSimsPhoto) July 29, 2016

Yes, reading Ben’s timeline was much more entertaining than actually listening to Hillary speak.

Perhaps Hillary's historic moment wasn't that convincing because robots have no gender

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) July 29, 2016

Does that mean Hillary will have to start playing the robot card? Asking for a friend.

Hillary's plan is to speak long enough that all the mortals die off and she can assume the throne by walking over their desiccated skulls.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) July 29, 2016

Mwahahahahahaha.

All joking aside, this speech is like being clocked in the head repeatedly with a sledgehammer made of petrified dog feces.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) July 29, 2016

Yuck. And sadly, true.

Worst. Speech. Ever.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) July 29, 2016

That’s the consensus.

But at this point, what difference does it make?