MSNOW Cuts Feed in Panic as Spencer Pratt Supporters Drop Unfiltered Truth Bombs
Dems Lecturing About Standards of Conduct Shift Into Stammer Overdrive When Asked About...
Terry Moran Crashes Out Defending Scott Pelley ... Demands Martyrdom for the Idiot...
Katie Porter's Campaign Gets Mashed — Stuck in Single Digits in a Brutal...
Nazi Platner Flees DC Fundraisers, Blames Big Bad Media at Family Home (After...
Scott Pelley's Departing Statement Contains the Most Cringe-Inducing Quote Ever From a Lib...
NJ Dems Just Chose an Al-Qaeda Volunteer Who Testified for the WTC Bomber...
A Glance at the People Most Upset CBS News Canned Scott Pelley Speaks...
Ripple Defect: Brian Stelter Says Scott Pelley’s CBS News Firing Is Like an...
Time’s Up: CBS News Fires Insubordinate Scott Pelley After Clash With New ‘60...
'Minor Crimes' Doing a Lot of Heavy Lifting to Defend Protests in Wired...
Antifa Members Disrupt Council Meeting That Declared Them Terrorists, Act Like Terrorists
Senate Candidate Alexander Vindman’s Aides Shield Him From Questions About Graham Platner
Principles? What Principles? Cuck Schumer Sticks by Nazi Platner, Repeats Win Mantra Like...
Mamdani-Backed Congressional Candidate Deletes Posts About Abolishing Police, Prisons, and...

FUME: Twitter insisting Lila Rose and Live Action remove this content to lift the BAN on their ads will INFURIATE you

Remember when Jack Dorsey told everyone (even Congress!) there is no political bias on his website?

Good times.

Granted, we all knew he was full of crap when he made the claim but still. Otherwise, why would Twitter be banning ads from pro-life accounts like Lila Rose and Live Action?

Advertisement

So basically, any content that tells the truth about the horrors of abortion must be removed from their site and Twitter feeds for the ban to be lifted.

What a crock.

From USAToday:

Twitter’s reasoning for blocking Live Action’s message? In emails to us, the company has said that our content violated its sensitive advertising content policy, which prohibits “inflammatory or provocative content which is likely to evoke a strong negative reaction.”

Some examples of this supposedly offensive content include pictures of children developing in the womb and even simple ultrasound images of babies — like the ones that expectant parents hang on their refrigerator doors.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s OK for Planned Parenthood to tweet that a woman has a right to an abortion, but when I tweet and try to promote that a baby has a right to life, Twitter considers that inflammatory.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s fine for Planned Parenthood to tweet that taxpayers who don’t want to fund the nation’s largest abortion chain are “extremists,” but when I tweet that there are alternative options to Planned Parenthood, Twitter calls that an offensive violation of policy.

Advertisement

Notice they’re not censoring the harpies pushing abortion up to and including birth.

Oof.

How dare Lila and her organization tell the truth about abortion.

‘Nuff said.


Related:

Beep, beep, BEEEEP: Steven Crowder apologizes for using certain ‘words’ on his show and Vox’s Carlos Maza MELTS DOWN

‘We’re REALLY doing this’?! Dan Crenshaw NAILS House Dems for playing dishonest politics in voting to hold Barr in contempt

Somebody’s NERVOUS: Eric Holder sure seems anxious to get Trump impeached sooner than later, wonder why

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement