Remember when Jack Dorsey told everyone (even Congress!) there is no political bias on his website?

Good times.

Granted, we all knew he was full of crap when he made the claim but still. Otherwise, why would Twitter be banning ads from pro-life accounts like Lila Rose and Live Action?

So basically, any content that tells the truth about the horrors of abortion must be removed from their site and Twitter feeds for the ban to be lifted.

What a crock.

From USAToday:

Twitter’s reasoning for blocking Live Action’s message? In emails to us, the company has said that our content violated its sensitive advertising content policy, which prohibits “inflammatory or provocative content which is likely to evoke a strong negative reaction.”

Some examples of this supposedly offensive content include pictures of children developing in the womb and even simple ultrasound images of babies — like the ones that expectant parents hang on their refrigerator doors.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s OK for Planned Parenthood to tweet that a woman has a right to an abortion, but when I tweet and try to promote that a baby has a right to life, Twitter considers that inflammatory.

Twitter’s actions suggest it’s fine for Planned Parenthood to tweet that taxpayers who don’t want to fund the nation’s largest abortion chain are “extremists,” but when I tweet that there are alternative options to Planned Parenthood, Twitter calls that an offensive violation of policy.

Notice they’re not censoring the harpies pushing abortion up to and including birth.

Oof.

How dare Lila and her organization tell the truth about abortion.

‘Nuff said.

Related:

Beep, beep, BEEEEP: Steven Crowder apologizes for using certain ‘words’ on his show and Vox’s Carlos Maza MELTS DOWN

‘We’re REALLY doing this’?! Dan Crenshaw NAILS House Dems for playing dishonest politics in voting to hold Barr in contempt

Somebody’s NERVOUS: Eric Holder sure seems anxious to get Trump impeached sooner than later, wonder why