Rep. Mark Meadows has had it with the claims of collusion “evidence” that never seem to be produced by Democrats such as Rep. Eric Swalwell.
For Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, + Dems claiming for 2 years they’ve seen “collusion” evidence, how about this. Let’s declassify all evidence you say exists, and ALSO declassify the underlying documents that “justified” the investigation.
(Spoiler: There is no collusion evidence)
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) March 27, 2019
Instead of substantively responding, Swalwell started telling Meadows, who works in the same building, how he could get in touch with him.
Next time @ me. You also have my cell phone number & see me every day at work. If you’re serious, you know how to find me. And you can show you’re serious by asking @realDonaldTrump to release the #MuellerReport. https://t.co/EZwx1Etv5q
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) March 27, 2019
So Meadows did @ him and ripped him an even bigger new one.
I’m for letting Americans see it all, Congressman. Your evidence and mine. Only difference is—you never had any collusion evidence to start with. And what’s worse, I think you know that. See you on Monday. https://t.co/JLPLDqiAIG
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) March 28, 2019
Kaboom.
?⚾ Congressman Meadows swings just in time for opening day. ? Play ball! https://t.co/bA0rfbeO3f
— Amy Tarkanian (@MrsT106) March 28, 2019
WOW read this exchange ?? https://t.co/R9uMR14YFe
— Ryan Van Sickle ⭐⭐⭐ (@Ryan_VanSickle) March 28, 2019
????? https://t.co/FvPqvfgFzv
— Slick the Bougie Chick (@navychick1993) March 28, 2019
Let’s see this professional debate!!!! https://t.co/6uynCuI2bq
— Johnny Friedlander (@jfriedlander95) March 28, 2019
Swalwell would never debate Meadows for a couple of reasons.
One is that Meadows would tear him to shreds.
The second is that Swalwell has no basis to support any of his claims.
Burned! https://t.co/heP4wJVjt6
— Wild Hogs (@WildHogs6) March 28, 2019
Do these Democrats really think that the American people are going to believe that Robert Mueller’s team investigated Trump for two-plus years and somehow missed some heavily-implicating piece of evidence?