As Twitchy told you, the Supreme Court struck some major blows to liberals today, upholding Trump’s travel ban and striking down California forced-speech laws requiring pro-life pregnancy crisis centers to refer patients to abortion providers.
SCOTUS delivers pro-life — and free-speech — win in 5-4 NIFLA decision https://t.co/vDqrE5YyqX pic.twitter.com/zKztPWKTLv
— HotAir.com (@hotairblog) June 26, 2018
Those decisions aren’t sitting well at all with our journalistic superiors.
Dear reporters,
Please stop commenting on Supreme Court decisions that you didn't read and don't understand. We get that you think decisions should be based on your preferred outcomes instead of the law, but that's not how it works.
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) June 26, 2018
Bloomberg News’ Sahil Kapur, for one, is beside himself:
SCOTUS 2018
—Upholds Trump’s travel ban
—OKs Ohio voter purge
—Backs anti-gay-wedding baker
—Allows gerrymandered maps
—OKs online betting+sales taxes
—Smacks public sector unions
—Backs biz over workers: arbitration
—Backs cellphone privacy
—Kills CA abortion-rights law
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) June 26, 2018
Journalism … how does it work? Not like that.
Wow this isn’t a manipulated presentation at all.
— JAC (@michcusejoe5) June 26, 2018
This is a great example. Every one of these descriptions relates purely to policy outcomes (& are framed from the perspective of one side). https://t.co/6THKDbPxrO
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) June 26, 2018
—Upholds proper executive auth
—OKs purge of nonvoters
—Backs religious liberty
—Allows state to wrt district maps
—OKs online betting+sales taxes
—Sides w/workers over compelled union mbrship
—Backs individual suits
—Backs cellphone privacy
—Kills attack on freedom of speech https://t.co/qEBfZvRUMe— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) June 26, 2018
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/1011645358462656512
Area Reporter Reveals Leftwing Bias. https://t.co/AsvFIIH4XO
— RBe (@RBPundit) June 26, 2018
FYI, this list is a summary of the DNC talking points Sahil got about 25 minutes ago.
Notice how he passes this off as his own "analysis." https://t.co/AsvFIIH4XO
— RBe (@RBPundit) June 26, 2018
That does seem to be the case …
5-4 rulings featuring Gorsuch in the majority are piling up.
Trump travel ban✔️
Voter roll purges✔️
CA pregnancy law❌
Gerrymandering✔️
Arbitration✔️ https://t.co/PeoPQnI1sD— Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) June 26, 2018
Ahem.
https://twitter.com/kebejay/status/1011646665114054656
Are we supposed to be unhappy about this? I mean, beyond the obviously prejudicial wording of some of the items ("Kills CA abortion-rights law"? Give me a break).
— Homeless Libertarian (@JoeDan1024) June 26, 2018
It’s certainly Kapur’s prerogative to be pissed. But if he’s going to pass off his pissiness as honest journalism, that’s when we’re gonna have to call him out.
Mind you, this is a "reporter."
— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) June 26, 2018
https://twitter.com/alwaysonoffense/status/1011644671846699008