The Acosta vs. Miller dustup at yesterday’s press conference has the pro-Resistance crowd pulling out all the stops, no matter how ridiculous:
Historians slam the WH remarks about the Statue of Liberty:"It's like saying the Bill of Rights doesn't count': https://t.co/lQKHUwWzm9 pic.twitter.com/c9ZAqxQTrq
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) August 3, 2017
They do try SO hard.
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/893173825600401409
Unreal.
https://twitter.com/BradyDube/status/893182756800344064
In other words, totally comparable according to some.
https://twitter.com/SouthernKeeks/status/893174006836318210
https://twitter.com/CrankyGordon/status/893177448787038211
Congress ratified the Bill of Rights, guys. Not that it makes the statement okay, just…come on. https://t.co/4Ui4nCh3QE
— Emily Zanotti’s Great & Unmatched Wisdom (@emzanotti) August 3, 2017
It is literally not even remotely analogous to that. https://t.co/rUdXYvPL5L
— The Snark Knight (@TheBrownFolder) August 3, 2017
https://twitter.com/28ShermanSOBL1/status/893176193419169792
No part of the statue of liberty is in the bill of rights, which is actual law. But, you would know that if you were actual historians https://t.co/Oi3dOyRCIU
— Tommy (@TommyBeeswax) August 3, 2017
What's the plural of ignoramus?
That's what makes up the staff at @MSNBC https://t.co/sVuss0w7Vm
— BayAreaFrau (@bayareahausfrau) August 3, 2017
I am unaware of the amendment that incorporated The New Colossus. Historians. https://t.co/KBV1JrB3vM
— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) August 3, 2017
Anyone that would compare a Constitutional amendment to a poem is a flack, not a historian. https://t.co/Qz5jUzEYMk
— Persnickety (@Dawnsfire) August 3, 2017