This is the first time in six years I have been happy to hear from Sarah Palin. She's more credible on this than the NY Times. https://t.co/r8o8avUNlV
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) June 15, 2017
This morning, Sarah Palin spoke out about the New York Times’ disgusting and defamatory editorial tying her to the 2011 shooting attack that wounded Rep. Gabby Giffords and killed six people:
Sarah Palin calls @nytimes editorial "sickening" pic.twitter.com/ho0C6W21Qw
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) June 15, 2017
Hard to argue with that.
She's right. https://t.co/g4EFyFhqTA
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) June 15, 2017
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/875366829526528002
https://twitter.com/HikerDog67/status/875369235173781504
She's right. You can say things about her, but influencing the Arizona shooting is not one of them. https://t.co/qYNJqBTtjk
— Crusty Gobblestein (@NathanWurtzel) June 15, 2017
Since yesterday’s editorial was published, many people have suggested that Palin has grounds to sue. That’s an option that she’s apparently exploring:
(1/2) @nytopinion – commonsense suggestion by a journalist, am talking to attorneys this AM and exploring options. BTW, wonder.. pic.twitter.com/jACvxwUBZH
— Sarah Palin (@SarahPalinUSA) June 15, 2017
(2/2) …WHY someone would no longer be in public eye? Think constant libel & slander have anything to do with it? ?
— Sarah Palin (@SarahPalinUSA) June 15, 2017
***
Related:
New York Times determined to find political balance in shootings, even if means reviving old lie
There they go again! NY Times doubles down on post-shooting shamelessness
‘When you’ve lost Chris Hayes’: Does this slam mean NYT leaned WAY too far forward?
‘Still garbage’: New York Times’ ‘correction’ to Sarah Palin smear only makes them look WORSE