Prolife women aren't real women? Even if they identify as women? https://t.co/wfbPu2vsaO
— Ryan T. Anderson (@RyanTAnd) January 16, 2017
You might want to take a few deep breaths before reading any further, because what we are about to tell you is nothing short of repugnant.
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/821125194982899712
It really is.
As Twitchy told you earlier, pro-abort shill and supposed feminist Jessica Valenti flipped her lid over the news that the Women’s March would be welcoming pro-life women to participate. Because pro-life women aren’t real women or something. Well, now, thanks to the uproar that Valenti helped to generate, the Women’s March has decided that some women just don’t deserve to be a part of it all.
https://twitter.com/AmyOtto8/status/821114565702209536
They may as well:
The Women's March confirmed that they removed a pro-life group from their list of partners in response to my articlehttps://t.co/GNFfSjYbZq
— Emma Green (@emmaogreen) January 16, 2017
Congratulations?
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/821125276126023680
This is nothing to be proud of.
"“The Women’s March’s platform is pro-choice and that has been our stance from day one," they said in a statement.
— Emma Green (@emmaogreen) January 16, 2017
"The anti-choice organization in question is not a partner of the Women's March on Washington. We apologize for this error,” they continued.
— Emma Green (@emmaogreen) January 16, 2017
A woman's right to make choices about what's best for her and her body is central to our platform. Read more: https://t.co/X9Z0pV2cif
— Women's March (@womensmarch) January 16, 2017
Our statement regarding press today: pic.twitter.com/z1y9cfFFvY
— Women's March (@womensmarch) January 16, 2017
Thanks for clearing that up, Women’s March.
this is a pathetic move.
— Lyndsey Fifield (@lyndseyfifield) January 16, 2017
Women "stronger together" where more agree like treatment of women, work equality. Women's March stance is unfortunate & counter-productive. https://t.co/sF6GLO24dt
— Mindy Finn (@mindyfinn) January 16, 2017
That’s a polite way of putting it.
So, if I'm reading my timeline correctly, #WomensMarch isn't a thing to support women, it's a pro-abortion march, then?
— Michelle Ray (@GaltsGirl) January 16, 2017
So it's a march for abortion rather than for women?
— Etienne de Montfort (@2cruel4skool) January 16, 2017
So the #WomensMarch is now a Pro-Abortion march. Good to know.
— Stacey (@ScotsFyre) January 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/molratty/status/821125013143228417
YAY! Good work and great example of inclusion! The platform then is abortion, not women. #AbortionMarch!
— Brian Lerias (@lerias1968) January 16, 2017
How is that pro-woman, exactly?
But If a woman chooses to be pro-life you sling them to the curb because that disrupts your platform?
I sense a contradiction@SouthernKeeks https://t.co/9nZW1zS7HM— Brad Slager: It's Lt-Col-VP-Rev-Kaiser, SIR ? ? (@MartiniShark) January 16, 2017
@RosieGray @TheAtlantic it seems counter productive to hold this women's march and exclude women's groups.
— Emily (@iluv2pekes) January 16, 2017
One might say they were given no choice? https://t.co/MsGpl5QKPK
— Federalist Musket?? (@Patriot_Musket) January 16, 2017
I had hoped your claim that ALL women are welcome was true. Very sad to see it isn't. #prolife #WomensMarch
— LoriStorr (@Citizen1) January 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/jpteti/status/821129439367065602
https://twitter.com/FloralColony/status/821124800601006080
congratulations on silencing an entire group of women in the name of "women's rights."
— Jordan. (@_jordanlee93) January 16, 2017
To the left, women only count when they are rabidly in favor of aborting little women in the womb https://t.co/CrtZ7gA1x9
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) January 16, 2017
Shameful.
— EstherB (@aleravrehtse) January 16, 2017
Barbaric yet spineless.
— Brian Carmody (@BrianZKing) January 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/LilMissRightie/status/821123169021001732
A disgusting, intolerant movement. They should remove “women” from the name. https://t.co/qSZuKWsLvU
— Michelle (@michnic70) January 16, 2017
If the Women’s March wants to embrace a culture of death, they can have it. They’ll ultimately have to answer for it.
https://twitter.com/LilMissRightie/status/821126447792267266
In attempting to purge feminism of pro-life women, the Women’s March is only hurting the cause of women’s rights.
This is absolutely nuts and, dear god, my friends on the left, you need to fight against this! https://t.co/7R8f3lSPCa
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) January 16, 2017
There are a LOT of women who identify as feminist and also pro-life. This isn't some fringe religious thing. These women are passionate (1
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) January 16, 2017
I've met several pro-life pro-feminism women who are very active in politics on the key local/state levels. These women are your allies! (2
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) January 16, 2017
You can't build a movement by kicking everyone out. We need VERY loud voices from the religious left objecting to this exclusion (3
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) January 16, 2017
I think of prominent left-religious voices like @rachelheldevans who could lead the charge in getting the left to accept pro-lifers (4
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) January 16, 2017
Let me be as plain as day: pro-life is too big a group to spit in their faces. If they want to join you, find a way to welcome them! (5
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) January 16, 2017
***
Related:
Pro-abort Jessica Valenti ‘horrified’ that pro-life women want to join Women’s March
Perfect: Patricia Heaton turns the tables on ‘pro-choice’ Jessica Valenti