Donna Brazile has a big problem with Russia’s alleged interference in our recent election. Which in itself is not all that remarkable, as the allegations are unsettling, to say the least.
But for Brazile to suggest that she has any moral standing on something like this is … well, it’s pretty ridiculous:
There was a time, if a foreign power interfered with an American election, that both political parties would condemn it. #ElectoralCollege
— Donna Brazile (@donnabrazile) December 12, 2016
What about when the interference comes from a domestic source? Like, say, when you leaked debate questions to Hillary’s campaign?
There was a time when media leaked debate questions to candidate both parties would condemn it.
— Robert Angelica (@robertangelica) December 12, 2016
There was a time, if a Dem cheated and got questions for her candidate, that both political parties would condemn it.
— judy goldberg (@judygoldberg3) December 12, 2016
There was a time when media personalities respected the voting process…and didn't give questions to Presidential candidates.
— Pockets (@Hairypockets) December 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/TheTruthMonkey/status/808401023429709824
Coming from miss interference herself. Remember sending hill-dog the Q's to the debates???? I do
— Irishman568 (@Irishman568) December 12, 2016
What about when you personally interfere with an American election, Donna? That's cool, right?
— David Kennedy (@dtkennedy) December 12, 2016
You interfered by giving Hillary questions from the debate Donna and you lack the courage to admit it and apologize.
— Jay Rue (@jaybluuee) December 12, 2016
You helped Hillary cheat during the debates. You have nothing to say here.
— Barapasaurus (@Barapasaurus) December 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/ToneLocNV/status/808402314205622272
Not even a smidgen.
***
Related:
CHEATERS! Donna Brazile shared THIS question with Clinton camp ahead of CNN Town Hall
WikiLeaks: Donna Brazile leaked ANOTHER town hall question to Hillary’s campaign?