On occasion, the New York Times can be the source of great amusement:
.@NYTimes says Rudy has conflicts of interest that preclude him from being Sec of State…
BC of former businesshttps://t.co/JZ7iqEY0Z8
— HARLAN Z. HILL (@Harlan) November 17, 2016
Does that scenario ring any bells, New York Times?
This is f-ing LAUGHABLE bc they defended HRC despite her ACTIVE conflicts of interest as Sec of State
The @NYTimes has lost all credibility https://t.co/TZURJrIvJC
— HARLAN Z. HILL (@Harlan) November 17, 2016
Maybe it’s totally different this time because Giuliani’s a Republican.
ironic this wasn't an issue when they endorsed Hillary. Once again they only attack Republicans.
— Peter Brady (@peacemakerPete) November 17, 2016
Lol just something else for @nytimes to whine about. I guess they forgot about HRC, the State Dept and the Clinton Foundation ties? https://t.co/aLI9N0Gl2k
— NotSoGraceful (@NotSoGraceful26) November 17, 2016
I thought the Times apologized for shitty reporting??? I guess that's over already??
— Jive Soul Bro (@PessPatriot) November 17, 2016