Unassigned

Tough crowd: CNN reminded that Hillary will let them know when their fact-checking services are needed

Not that it needed to be said, but those WikiLeaks emails made it pretty clear that Hillary Clinton didn’t have to worry about invoking her fact checkers in the media from the debate podium whenever things got a little dicey up there.

Advertisement

Things have reached the point where PolitiFact was able to declare as half-true Donald Trump’s assertion that Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails, based on his unprovable, unspoken implication that there was something criminal to her actions. Everyone knows what he meant, though.

Imagine how well viewers took CNN political producer Dan Merica’s note that Hillary Clinton at a rally in Florida Tuesday incorrectly stated she was in New York City on 9/11.

OK, it is what she said, but no one would ever call out a man for saying something that’s incorrect, right?

https://twitter.com/jlpulice/status/793598815597170689

https://twitter.com/UKinNYC/status/793601940634542080

https://twitter.com/JestOneVote/status/793599502812786688

Advertisement

So, would PolitiFact rate this one only half-true, since she clearly misspoke, or true, because her supporters understood what she meant to say?

https://twitter.com/GlenVotes2016/status/793599960637771776

Hillary’s supporters like fact-checks of her speeches almost as much as they like James Comey these days. “Incorrectly tells” was a bit judgmental; this was obviously more a case of her misspeaking, like she did when she relayed the story of her trip to Bosnia.

https://twitter.com/RONCOULTER/status/793600872521601025

https://twitter.com/BadMisterKitty/status/793601407765151745

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/ZhidoBandera/status/793600102812319744

Kind of like this one?

https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/763784580633653248

Once they’ve managed to drag Hillary across the finish line, the news networks won’t have to worry about ugly accusations of lying anymore when “Clinton misspoke” will suffice.