https://twitter.com/justkarl/status/791030755413614592
At this point, “Dilbert” creator Scott Adams is pretty much all-in for Trump. And that’s his prerogative. But while it’s one thing to prefer Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton, it’s quite another to take it to this level:
If there are no sponsored terror attacks before Election Day, it means ISIS prefers Clinton. They have the means. Think about it. #Trump
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) October 25, 2016
Maybe Adams should’ve spent a little more time thinking before he sent that tweet.
So, um… if there _is_ a terror attack before Election Day, what does that mean? https://t.co/Oh4MIeBx92
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) October 25, 2016
By this logic, if there IS an ISIS-related terror attack, does that mean they're pro-Trump? Ah, but I forget I'm talking to a crazy person. https://t.co/ZYOzcAAzh0
— The Nats Won The World Series (@EsotericCD) October 25, 2016
Crazy is as crazy does.
Talk about a guy who's toasted his brand. I never want to bother w/ Dilbert again.
— Sean Hackbarth (@seanhackbarth) October 25, 2016
.@seanhackbarth We always thought the creator identified with the title character. Turns out he was the pointy-haired boss all along.
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) October 25, 2016
>@jimgeraghty @seanhackbarth And this is his ideal candidate pic.twitter.com/ryWUz2dmGm
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) October 25, 2016
Talk about sad.
Welp. This is pretty revolting. https://t.co/XLRGE6XffE
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) October 25, 2016
How did you get this way? What happened?
— Meredith D. (@YankeeBeatCheck) October 25, 2016
You know that other people can see these tweets, don’t you?
— Tim Turner (@tim2040) October 25, 2016
I can only imagine how big and thick your foil hat is at this point.
— Amy B ??⭐️ (@amybuchwald) October 25, 2016
Thought about it. What a load of rubbish.
— Cyn Clagar (@cynclagar) October 25, 2016
are you endorsing / encouraging an attack on innocent ppl to prove some sort of distorted point?
— Blaine (@mayorblaine) October 25, 2016
https://twitter.com/joemillsv/status/791031989637873664
https://twitter.com/nairmak_gren/status/791032915635372032
What? No. That makes no sense dude.
— Amy Nicholson (@AmySueQT) October 25, 2016
flawed and demented thinking
— ʙᴏʟᴇsʟᴀᴡ ᴛʜᴇ ʙʀᴀᴠᴇ (@boleslawthebrav) October 25, 2016
your logic has run out. No use trying to explain things anymore for you
— learner_ok (@learner_ok) October 25, 2016
It's really astonishing that you haven't been committed to a psychiatric facility yet.
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) October 25, 2016
https://twitter.com/thesjessop/status/791028840428601345
dude, seek help immediately!
— Euroman #fbpe (@CreativeSteveF) October 25, 2016
Get help…seriously, get help now.
— mike cook (@dildorunnl) October 25, 2016
https://twitter.com/TCoop6231/status/791026299880046592
This git is a complete wackadoodle. https://t.co/VwjKzKFbNP
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) October 25, 2016
https://twitter.com/NathanWurtzel/status/791028560563675140
https://twitter.com/maxwellarm/status/791029077159411716
I never read Dilbert before this year but after seeing more and more of Adams, I've really doubled the time I spent not reading his stuff. https://t.co/bzBaxadcfb
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) October 25, 2016
Brace yourselves, folks:
I'm just getting started 😉
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) October 25, 2016
Just getting started? Hmmm … may we offer a piece of advice?
https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/791031226966564864
Scott it's time to stop.
— SwiftOnSecurity (@SwiftOnSecurity) October 25, 2016
Think about it, Scott.
***
Related:
Here’s why Dilbert creator Scott Adams says Donald Trump will win in a ‘landslide’
Dilbert creator Scott Adams analyzes Hillary Clinton’s 9:20 a.m. ‘woke up’ tweet on Orlando
Dilbert creator Scott Adams has one key question that *both* candidates should answer
Dilbert creator Scott Adams RTs hoax photo of Trump supporter allegedly beaten by Clinton supporters