https://twitter.com/Alek_AECM/status/783737879075840001
If at any point you’ve suggested that there was some shady business between Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the Clinton Foundation, you should be ashamed of yourself. Because the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Not one thing!
Oh, wait:
https://twitter.com/sarahcwestwood/status/783729878931734528
Check it out for yourself, if you’re so inclined:
it is on page 51 https://t.co/dh7RfXOPLu
— Sarah Westwood (@sarahcwestwood) October 5, 2016
https://twitter.com/MichaelRWarren/status/783733493855559681
How do you like that?
Corrupt charity conspiring with a govt agency to punish a journalist. Let that sink in. https://t.co/l66a92XQBX
— Jason (@jasonelevation) October 5, 2016
State Dept: We're not aware of any actions that were influenced by the Clinton Foundation, other than our conspiring with it to burn foes. https://t.co/nbMqcJoYFy
— Razor (@hale_razor) October 5, 2016
https://twitter.com/hale_razor/status/783736505810362368
I can't think this should EVER be acceptable in ANY administration. #BurnBabyBurn
— Ted Zeigler (@twzig) October 5, 2016
Oh, and did we mention these?
More previously-unreleased HRC "work-related emails" mysteriously appear, and they just happen to involve the Clinton Foundation pic.twitter.com/sEaAe6ehdi
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 5, 2016
Looks like someone to whom the Clintons "owed" something had direct access to Huma/HRC and was recommended for an ambassadorship pic.twitter.com/BJ6ZnSZ5FZ
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 5, 2016
More evidence that State Department and Clinton Foundation business were merged, in this instance at HRC's behest pic.twitter.com/qXY1Dv9yNI
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 5, 2016
But don’t worry. There’s not a smidgen of corruption here.