Oh look, SJWs are outraged … so shocking.
For anyone who thinks that sexist marketing to children isn't a problem… Really @UKGap ? HT @PsychScientists pic.twitter.com/BnGCQhujwG
— Let Toys Be Toys (@LetToysBeToys) July 31, 2016
Does anyone else want to shake these people and scream “WHO CARES?!”
It’s a GAP ad. That’s it.
how about let boys have something positive for once.. You don't argue when it's reversed to benefit girls.
— AntiMisandry (@antimisandry) August 1, 2016
Look here, men MUST be destroyed to make way for women … or something.
We are not great at this whole SJW outrage thing, bear with us.
didn't say that. I said you don't complain when girls are portrayed superior to boys in some form. #equality
— AntiMisandry (@antimisandry) August 2, 2016
Triggered!
seriously?? 7yr old daughter determined to be a scientist, what kind of message is this
— Vicky S (@fens_commuter) July 31, 2016
Umm … it’s just clothes?
I saw that today!!! I thought the exact same as I've bought the "boys" shirt for my daughter!
— HannahBananaBakery (@HanBanBakery) July 31, 2016
OMG! Outrage! Exclamation points!!!
arghh! alarming.. what were they thinking?
— CLE (@Bluebirdlouise) July 31, 2016
Arghh! Maybe they were thinking hey, these kids look cute in our clothes so we should put them in an ad to sell our clothes? Could be?
This is beyond insulting for girls, never mind grown-up female scholars
— Veronika Koller (@VeronikaKoller) July 31, 2016
YEAH! Girls shouldn’t want to be butterflies because sexism or something … this is so stupid.
@imjustmike @UKGap @PsychScientists @ASA_UK
Get over yourselves and maybe direct your faux outrage elsewhere.— Max ⚡ Power ? (@Max_Power_) August 1, 2016
Word.
So many triggered by this which is a shame, you should not dismiss the ability of a social butterfly.
— ALEX BLAND (@alexbland) August 1, 2016
Evil male! (we agree)
https://twitter.com/Lizardlegged/status/759877607445762049
Or maybe you could tell her that it’s JUST an ad and you’re making way more out of it than you should?
Maybe?