Unassigned

Buzzfeed reporter omits important chunk of Rupert Murdoch tweet; Update: Reporter failed to tell full story about himself

So, what did Kaczynski leave off? Only the 101 characters Murdoch used to qualify his statement.

Advertisement

Whoops! Twitterers called him out for his glaring omission.

https://twitter.com/FigDrewton/status/223098922992807937

https://twitter.com/NathanWurtzel/status/223100063675723777

Kaczynski quickly apologized:

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/223100140251136001

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/223102253815439360

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/223102455662129152

AlexaShrugged kindly pointed out the difference between a regular retweet (RT) and a modified retweet (MT):

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/223102748424548353

Kaczynski seems contrite enough, but he would do well to remember that astute Twitterers will find out when they’re not getting the full story. Let’s hope he takes Alexa’s advice to heart.

Advertisement

(h/t @Slublog)

***

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/223115007574028288

***

Update:

It would seem that Kaczynski also left out a few details of his own Twitter knowledge. Only yesterday, he debated what constitutes an MT with Adam Baldwin:

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/222864424640323586

https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/222865698530144258

C’mon, Andrew. If you’re indeed a “researcher/reporter,” feigning ignorance should be beneath you. Twitter never forgets — and we’ll be keeping our eye on you.