Wow, THAT was your takeaway? https://t.co/3znwb9f8xg
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) June 28, 2016
As Twitchy told you, earlier today, CNN eagerly spun for Hillary Clinton after GOP members of the House Benghazi Committee held a press conference. Despite the findings of the committee’s report, CNN asserted that the committee found “no wrongdoing by Clinton.”
The New York Times went a similar route:
Breaking News: A 2-year inquiry into the Benghazi attacks found no new evidence of wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton https://t.co/PNv9wiwmbJ
— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 28, 2016
As obnoxious as that is, though, the Times managed to make it even worse with this:
Seriously? The New York Times is STILL insisting the video "incitied" an al Qaeda-linked attack on Sept 11. pic.twitter.com/KShAjqwTHe
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) June 28, 2016
(2/2) Benghazi report specifically says the video had nothing to do with attack. But NYT didn't get the memo. pic.twitter.com/ZJ9XFmbt6F
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) June 28, 2016
Nearly four years after those brave Americans lost their lives, the New York Times is still perpetuating a lie. Spitting on the memories of the dead — just like Hillary.
nothing matters more than the protection of the queen
— Leo Izmir (@_LeoIzmir) June 28, 2016