WSJ’s James Taranto presented a “compare & contrast” of Salon articles that were published following the deaths of Antonin Scalia and Osama bin Laden:
Salon on bin Laden's death: https://t.co/byt8HSPW1Z
Salon on Scalia's death: https://t.co/HKkVLGugJT— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) February 19, 2016
How’s that for an offset?
Awful. But then again, it’s Salon.
Remarkable difference of reaction. https://t.co/7mTNt4T48K
— J. Michael Barnes (@wufpackmike) February 19, 2016
@jamestaranto @instapundit Seond piece on celebrating Scalia's death explicitly said it was wrong to celebrate Bin Laden's
— Don Surber (@donsurber) February 19, 2016
@jamestaranto @Salon Absolutely Disgusting.
— D.H.S. (@BlankAlwaysWins) February 19, 2016
https://twitter.com/dinok1975/status/700531466674053120
@jamestaranto @JammieWF Majority of Salon clicks likely from those who can't believe they really said something
— Boris_Badenoff (@Boris_Badenoff) February 19, 2016
.@Salon likes Bin Laden more than it does Scalia, but in this climate and these times that's perfectly acceptable! https://t.co/JIBRgRG0ww
— James M. Cain (@dmcparson) February 19, 2016
@jamestaranto @jtLOL @Salon must I in fact read TWO Salon articles??? I need a lot more coffee first…
— Mark Anderson (@Manderskat) February 19, 2016
@jamestaranto @instapundit Nice Juxtaposition. Salon's concerned 4 grave dancing on a killer of 1000s, Hates an Obstruction to Dictatorship
— Simarilian (@simarilian) February 19, 2016
Why do I continue to be shocked? https://t.co/utuloEdrXn
— LJN (@ljnuzzi) February 19, 2016
More Salon insanity here.