Yes, what did Donna Brazile mean by one of her most recent tweets? Here’s the cryptic … and perhaps chilling .. tweet:
What's on your menu? As a lifelong Democrat, I am disappointed in background noise that is drowning out our candidates. Enough is enough.
— Donna Brazile (@donnabrazile) October 16, 2015
Wait … WHAT? Does she mean this “background noise”?
@donnabrazile Background noise = FBI investigation.
— MyIQ2xu™ (@realmyiq2xu2) October 16, 2015
@MartiniShark @donnabrazile some of that background noise is babies screaming as they are slaughtered in the womb.
— David covefe KAG (@USABoatnerd) October 16, 2015
Seriously. If one thinks any of that is “background noise,” then that is … beyond chilling.
Other Twitter users were also flabbergasted and schooled Ms. Brazile.
@donnabrazile so a FBI investagation is just background noise in liberal utopia?
— Sunflower ? (@OneSunflowerGrl) October 16, 2015
https://twitter.com/tuner225/status/654998650892980226
@donnabrazile Ur intellectual dishonesty can't be hidden! These 4 reasons aren't bckgrnd noise, they're REAL HUMANS! pic.twitter.com/ZJN7AHsohc
— YeahMe ♫♪ (@RichbroMe) October 16, 2015
Well, you know Hillary’s answer: “What difference does it make?” Are you saying the same, Ms. Brazile? If we give her the benefit of the doubt, perhaps she was instead talking about this:
@donnabrazile People demanding more debates or getting rid of exclusivity clause is not "background noise" – it's your base. #FireTheChair
— Jennifer Howell (@genxjenh) October 16, 2015
In which case, Brazile’s tweet would still be utterly asinine.
https://twitter.com/JonBanquer/status/655024681834012673
Yep.
And an exit point for both Brazile and Hillary Clinton:
And I'm disappointed in how many times Hillary has lied about that "background noise".@donnabrazile https://t.co/NGg8qvRaGl
— Brad Slager: It's Lt-Col-VP-Rev-Kaiser, SIR ? ? (@MartiniShark) October 16, 2015