Of course not. You see, the only coverage that the New York Times is providing on the sickening videos exposing the barbarism of Planned Parenthood is … defense. No, for real.
The New York Times again jumped to the defense of Planned Parenthood in the wake of the new undercover video http://t.co/A9ACpFR1MP
— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) July 29, 2015
NYT editors' recent defense of Planned Parenthood evokes an editorial they wrote in 1906: http://t.co/vsTufPy4Lp http://t.co/YpXtAiJ5EJ
— David Freddoso (@freddoso) July 27, 2015
Nothing to see here, guys! Move along. But what were huge stories, according to the New York Times?
The NY Times thinks Rubio's wife's driving record is front page news.
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) July 30, 2015
The NYT thought insinuating McCain was having an affair with a lobbyist was news.
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) July 30, 2015
Once again, its bias is showing. And it’s ugly.
Related:
Recommended
SMACK DOWN: Why silent on Planned Parenthood, media? This 1 flashback reminder exposes you …
OUTRAGEOUS: Some people notice something telling about media reports on 3rd Planned Parenthood video
DAMNING: These 6 quotes from 4th Planned Parenthood video will make your blood boil [photos, video]
‘IT’S ANOTHER BOY!’: 4th Planned Parenthood video released and they just keep getting worse