It is a “snap,” indeed. And it only took one 3-letter question. You see, Hillary Clinton’s campaign steamrolled the New York Times (great job, lapdogs) into a rewrite. Talk about rapid response! That “rapid response” was immediately put in shattering perspective.
A reminder:
If Hillary Clinton responded to terror attacks as fast as she responds to the NY Times, Chris Stevens would still be alive.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 24, 2015
Devastating.
And then came actor Adam Baldwin. Who used that perspective to sum up just how foul Hillary Clinton is with just those three letters:
https://twitter.com/AdamBaldwin/status/624501887685890049
Bam. “What difference does it make,” right Hillary?
It also, of course, highlights just how lapdoggy the media is as well.
@AdamBaldwin @redsteeze precisely… if you're a media entity other than Fox News.
— omgthatguy (@omgthatguy) July 24, 2015
Bingo.
Related:
Pathetic: Hillary Clinton’s campaign ‘steamrolled NYT for a rewrite’ (and got it)