'You learned nothing from the 90s’: WaPo reporter gets help determining if Clintons have 'ethical blind spot'

National political correspondent for the Washington Post, Karen Tumulty, asked a question almost everybody already knows the answer to:

Do the Clintons have an ethical blind spot when it comes to their donors? http://t.co/cZgNpMg6aA

— Karen Tumulty (@ktumulty) April 23, 2015

Really? Ha!

.@ktumulty asks if the Clintons have ethical blindspots. LOLOLOL. YES, Karen. They do. http://t.co/GuzfIRYdR8

— RBe (@RBPundit) April 23, 2015

Yep. That's how Clintons earned over $100 million. #wishicouldbedeadbroketoo https://t.co/3gtPGzL6aA

— Maddie (@maddiethinks) April 23, 2015

@ktumulty By the way, you learned nothing from the '90s scandal mongering. Be gone!

— Ralph Baldwin (@ralphb47) April 23, 2015

Actually, there wasn’t even a need for a qualifier in her question:

The Clintons have an ethical blind spot overall; Monicagate proved that. @ktumulty

— Matt Maggio (@MaggioMatt) April 23, 2015

https://twitter.com/fairflattaxnow/status/591340275726954496

@RBPundit @ktumulty

Actually, they don't have any ethics at all.

— Beebo (@beebobaby) April 23, 2015

We hope this helped answer the question.

***