Oh, CNN.
#ISIS may have had reasons to kill the Jordanian pilot by burning him instead of beheading him http://t.co/oEEcWcPm3l pic.twitter.com/K0jSsMf0Pv
— CNN (@CNN) February 6, 2015
Pro tip: When tweeting about ISIS, don’t appear as if you are rationalizing burning a man alive.
https://twitter.com/BlackbeardQAR/status/563551016759881728
https://twitter.com/TheLadyJaye/status/563550642174558209
https://twitter.com/Halpin_12/status/563553143540027393
https://twitter.com/TheLadyJaye/status/563553466875150337
https://twitter.com/Halpin_12/status/563554778366496769
https://twitter.com/LiliaKilmer/status/563549056949968897
@LiliaKilmer @CNN read the article. That's not what they're saying
— Emily (@EmilyBeee) February 6, 2015
@LiliaKilmer @CNN You realize they mean ISIS burnt him because they might have benefited from it instead of beheading him. #SMH
— Ian (@Anabsurdturtle) February 6, 2015
https://twitter.com/LiliaKilmer/status/563550321444540419
@LiliaKilmer @CNN Well it's not like people can just ignore it. It's a point that needs to be discussed.
— Ian (@Anabsurdturtle) February 6, 2015
https://twitter.com/LiliaKilmer/status/563551141154140161
@LiliaKilmer I don't understand how this correlates to Fox News at all?
— Ian (@Anabsurdturtle) February 6, 2015
Really. Of all the cable news networks, Fox is probably the least likely to rationalize the actions of ISIS.
But progs gotta prog.