Seriously. But that has never stopped the geniuses at Vox before, has it? Did the Super Bowl spark more absurdity from the “Voxsplainers”? Since it was a day ending in “y,” of course it did. Now with more prescient spoilers!
.@voxdotcom called it.
— IWantNothingHat (@Popehat) February 2, 2015
Yes. Yes, he did. Take a gander:
This is the reason why you follow @Popehat:
Shot & Chaserhttps://t.co/QVM741PdAAhttps://t.co/Cvdg0nLgy2
— Anthony Abides (@AnthonyAbides) February 2, 2015
Here’s the shot:
Tomorrow: Vox on why that was actually the right playcall.
— IWantNothingHat (@Popehat) February 2, 2015
Heh.
https://twitter.com/AHLondonTX/status/562085679619137536
Yes. Because here is the chaser:
https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/562253247998885888
Snickering madly! Oh, bless your self-parodying hearts.
“@ezraklein: This is the most persuasive defense of Pete Carroll's decision to throw that pass: http://t.co/O61Ipr6wad” Overthinking it.
— Brad Blackwell (@loansbrad) February 2, 2015
If “thinking” is a term used loosely. Was it even worse than it appeared at first blush?
https://twitter.com/mattapuzzo/status/562254043620601856
Well, one call was awesome:
“@PaulHsieh: Heh. Good call by @Popehat. pic.twitter.com/51OV1acI59”@TwitchyTeam
— Honeypot Spy (@AuburnJulia) February 2, 2015
Yep.
https://twitter.com/maybe_nate/status/562261352941486082
Related: