Johnny Manziel is making his first NFL start today, and he hasn’t been very accurate so far.
Cmon Manziel. Find some kind of accuracy.
— Que (@rightonQuelive) December 14, 2014
https://twitter.com/JR_Fantasy/status/544205654479478785
https://twitter.com/Joe_Forlenza/status/544208874849726465
What else hasn’t been very accurate lately? Oh yeah.
Johnny Manziel is less accurate than Rolling Stone.
— NotKennyRogers (@NotKennyRogers) December 14, 2014
That's cold: RT @NotKennyRogers Johnny Manziel is less accurate than Rolling Stone.
— John L. Pitts (@JohnLPitts) December 14, 2014
https://twitter.com/J_Pwrs/status/544210692501295104
Related:
‘Buzzfeed journalism, yo’: Are they trying to outdo Rolling Stone?
This ‘legendary’ fact-checking flashback is TOO good
The fact-check review at Rolling Stone is ‘like an IRS audit’
Feminist refuses to abandon the sinking ship Rolling Stone rape story
‘Journalism dysfunction’: Rolling Stone under fire for UVA gang rape story
Rolling Stone updates its UVA-rape story: ‘Our trust in her was misplaced’
#AngryLambchop Christopher Hayes adds his own ‘f*** you’ to Rolling Stone
‘Hoo boy’: These tweets are coming back to haunt disgraced Rolling Stone journo