You know, we’re asking ourselves that very same question. Because this is just perfection:
Apparently a Rolling Stone also gathers no evidence.
— NeoN: Automataster (@neontaster) December 5, 2014
Fan. Freaking. Tastic.
https://twitter.com/JimmySky/status/540968335916412928
@neontaster @jpodhoretz BOOM!
— Dbright21 (@Dbright21) December 5, 2014
@neontaster @RBPundit Genius!
— 5ini5ter (@5ini5ter) December 5, 2014
Perfect. RT: "@Neontaster: Apparently, a #RollingStone also gathers no evidence."
— Michelle Brody (@VanillaWaif) December 5, 2014
@neontaster : Oh, well played. Very well played. 😉
— I'm a woman, and I'm mad as Hell (@nowhere_nh) December 5, 2014
@AllThingsHLS @JimmySky All hail @neontaster !
— mark safranski (@zenpundit) December 5, 2014
@neontaster @CuffyMeh we have a winner
— Jason Spires (@lattewithstpaul) December 5, 2014
Hells yeah, we do.
*claps* RT @neontaster: Apparently a Rolling Stone also gathers no evidence.
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) December 5, 2014
Bravo, @neontaster. Bravo!
@JohnEkdahl *bows*
— NeoN: Automataster (@neontaster) December 5, 2014
***
Related:
‘Journalism dysfunction’: Rolling Stone under fire for UVA gang rape story
Rolling Stone updates its UVA-rape story: ‘Our trust in her was misplaced’