Either some Democrats voted twice, or the Washington Post made a boo boo in its coverage of the farm bill vote.
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/430795727208325120
Ummm? Probably not. RT @washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/mtz4HKJ7FP
— Anthony Michael Kreis (@AnthonyMKreis) February 4, 2014
Ummm…. RT @washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/QPoDu2e3Fb
— ButTimKrepp (@timkrepp) February 4, 2014
https://twitter.com/ScottGenzink/status/430796029177634816
https://twitter.com/postscript01/status/430796159813046272
When did we get 120 senators? “@washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/J6pPY2Snne”
— Joel Mendelson (@JPMendelson) February 4, 2014
I don't remember much from high school, but I thought there are 100 Senators. RT @washingtonpost UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52
— Sean's Ramblings (@seansramblings) February 4, 2014
Um…#twittermath RT @washingtonpost: UPDATE: Senate passes farm bill 68 to 52 http://t.co/b9QeuMDHvO
— cuz dats my bizness. like so like that (@ArykanotErika) February 4, 2014
Looks like it was just a simple typo, as the Farm Bill did pass, 68–32. This, however, wasn’t a typo:
CORRECTION: This tweet was wrong so we deleted it. CBO didn't say ACA would cut 2M jobs. It's about workers, not jobs pic.twitter.com/iAtq0cyIdQ
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) February 4, 2014
Um…
https://twitter.com/JohnGort/status/430797387209388033
@washingtonpost LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
— acitrep (@acitrep) February 4, 2014
@washingtonpost: Ohhhhhh much better. =|
— Evan Nolan (@Evan_Nolan) February 4, 2014
https://twitter.com/briarwoodsman/status/430798112894902272