'Fire and brimstone next': CNN doubles down on 'polar vortex' nonsense

Just yesterday, CNN reported that the United States had been sucked into the “polar vortex.” And now, we know why: global warming, of course!

Is the #polarvortex a side effect of global warming? Should we expect more events like this? http://t.co/4nZ04zs1zb pic.twitter.com/52FfrSxTqZ

— CNN (@CNN) January 7, 2014

They just can’t help themselves.

MSM for you RT @CNN: Is #polarvortex a side effect of global warming? Should we expect more?http://t.co/sH5wxRGsUb pic.twitter.com/NDcys3kiWn

— David Limbaugh (@DavidLimbaugh) January 7, 2014

When you're a Climate Cultist, you get to say everything is from global warming. http://t.co/j7M0mEQb7R

— Eric H. (@ericinva) January 7, 2014

Anyone for mockery?

Keep f'ing that chicken. RT @CNN Is the #polarvortex a side effect of global warming? Should we expect more events like this?

— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) January 7, 2014

https://twitter.com/mark_ccfc/status/420582791802138624

https://twitter.com/JasonBWhitman/status/420581806857924609

Yes. Cold means the globe is warming. RT @CNN Is the #polarvortex a side effect of global warming? Should we expect more events like this?

— RBe (@RBPundit) January 7, 2014

Umm, ok…“@SaraFeed: …really? MT @CNN: Is the #polarvortex a side effect of global warming? http://t.co/JQHWnlN0t2 pic.twitter.com/ePEd0G1f1n”

— Laurie Dhue (@RealLaurieDhue) January 7, 2014

Yes-witness tree mold on Jay Carney's face. MT @CNN: Is #polarvortex side effect of global warming? Should we expect more events like this?

— Rick Sheridan (@RickSheridan) January 7, 2014

'Fire and brimstone next': CNN doubles down on 'polar vortex' nonsense

Recommended