Unassigned

Choice of Color: Podcaster Joy Reid Sides With Clancy Trial Holdout Juror for the Wrong Reason

The Left has been pretty much united behind Lindsay Clancy, who admitted to killing her three children. They are still furious that the jury in her murder trial ended up deadlocked 11-1. In retaliation, the male holdout juror has faced intense scrutiny and hatred from the screeching Left, which is mostly comprised of women angry that he didn’t vote to acquit Clancy. She’s a white mother, after all. But then the unexpected happened — the hesitant-to-acquit juror was revealed to be black. That short-circuited the Left’s victimhood motherboard. Who to support? The white woman or the black man? You can guess who Joy Reid has sided with.

Advertisement

Here’s more. (READ)

Joy Reid and guest *defend* the black Clancy lone holdout juror and go after the white jurors for attacking him.Amazing."

They accused the man of refusing to deliberate, which actually is a bit defamatory"

"All of it was giving me so many microaggressions"

Lefty media has had a hell of a time sorting through the intersectional victim hierarchy on this one.

Joy Reid and her guest are on the right side, but for the wrong reason. (WATCH)

It’s like racism and sexism had a fender-bender.

Advertisement

Posters say Reid and her friend have thrown out logic and morality. They are supporting the black juror because they’re racist. Surprise!

We’ve seen and heard enough of Reid to know there’s no debating this.

It’s 2026, but white Democrats haven’t changed a bit.

The fact that this has to be said and defended shows how lost roughly half of our country is.

While the Right judges the holdout juror by the content of his character, the Left judges him by his skin color and sex.

Advertisement

Rodent-like Reid may have found a nut unexpectedly; we can expect her to resume being nuts until something equally rare happens again.