Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, was described as "fun" and "entertaining" by three of the female jurors who went public after a mistrial was declared, can also be described as desperate. It's not enough that they've doxxed the one lone holdout who actually followed the jury's instructions to determine if Clancy murdered her three children or not based on the facts — now Reddington wants to examine the metadata on the holdout's phone, according to The Daily Mail.
Lindsay Clancy's lawyer has asked a judge to probe the phone data of the sole juror who voted against acquitting the killer mom. 🔗 https://t.co/FoW4o5pZw7 pic.twitter.com/AJXtEvC2aL
— Daily Mail (@DailyMail) September 21, 2026
The Daily Mail reports:
The sole holdout juror, Michael P. Desronvil, 48, sided with prosecutors and said that he had no doubts about Clancy's guilt, in opposition to the verdict reached by the other jurors.
Now, Reddington has asked the judge, William Sullivan, to examine Desronvil's mobile phone metadata during the time the jury was deliberating over the case, according to a motion seen by the New York Times.
The motion also asks the judge to question Desronvil about the truthfulness of the statements he provided during jury selection and the use of his phone or any outside information during deliberations.
Reddington has requested the questioning to be on the record, in the presence of attorneys from both sides.
This is intimidation, bordering on harassment. What person would ever want to be on the jury again?
— Abigail Turner 🇺🇲✝️🇻🇦🇺🇸 (@aturner1776) September 21, 2026
This is harassment. Not only should the judge deny this impertinent request he should sanction the lawyer for his actions.
— Jim Williams (@Alpowolf) September 21, 2026
Recommended
Wow. Harassing the only juror with common sense because he didn't get his way. This attorney is a POS.
— Jodi Sinclair (@mamaofmastiffs) September 21, 2026
Would somebody disbar this lunatic already?
— Double Secret Mutation (@horsewithnonick) September 21, 2026
This is a violation of his rights. The lawyer should be disbarred and sued for harassment.
— Brad Koenig (@MavsLaker) September 21, 2026
The judge lacks the authority to do such a thing to a juror. Cell phone data seizure is only done by law enforcement during certain criminal investigations, and that by a search warrant. I am sick of that atty’s imbecilic prattling, and propagandists pumping it out.
— HURT FEELINGS DAY 🇱🇧 (@HURTFEELINGZDAY) September 21, 2026
If you abolish jury trials by normalizing defense attorneys publicly doxxing and harassing jurors, don't be surprised if the prosecutorial strategy of grieving parents starts involving doxxing and harassing defense attorneys.
— A Dude In Your Training Data (@newlooklurker) September 21, 2026
Doing discovery on a man who is convinced of her guilt because of the evidence. Interesting precedent.
— Brian Angeletti (@emperorbma) September 21, 2026
Sure, and those of the other 11. Wanna place bets on how many TikTok pro-Clancy videos the Clancy Coven on the jury watched and commented on?
— Juris Doctor Doom (@JurisDoctorDoom) September 21, 2026
They were probably looking at all of their supporters rallying outside with matching pink shirts.
This is a chilling precedent to imagine...
— helicity (@helicitywatches) September 21, 2026
They selected him. They can suck it. Where’s the prosecutor?
— Vince 🇺🇸 (@VGmt0800) September 21, 2026
Blatant jury intimidation at this point
— Chris Ben'wah (@punishedbenwah) September 21, 2026
The holdout proved he couldn't be intimidated by all of the Karens on the jury, but they're going to keep trying, even after the mistrial.
***