Brit Hume Has the PERFECT Response to Clancy Juror's Brag About Putting GIRL POWER Over Justice

Brit Hume didn’t need a monologue.

Then again, he never really does as the wry and dry Fox News pundit doesn't often mince words when commenting on trending stories in the media.

Case in point...

Paula Devlin, part of the 11 who wanted an insanity acquittal, is now saying the mostly female panel understood the trial as a turning point that could “make it better for other women.” That’s not how a murder jury is supposed to talk. The question in Plymouth was whether Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children — not whether a verdict could double as a policy statement for moms everywhere.

Watch:

During her next media tour stop, juror Paula Devlin says the mostly female jury knew the Lindsay Clancy trial could create change to “make it better for other women.”

“We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it… pic.twitter.com/4aBlCDzeUx
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 13, 2026

After a week of blaming the lone holdout for refusing to play along, this is the tell: some of those jurors weren’t just weighing evidence. They were thinking about the message.

Uh oh. https://t.co/SVeBKY4vgT
— Brit Hume (@brithume) September 13, 2026

Short.

Simple.

Accurate.

These jurors, especially Devlin who admitted they were using this trial not to determine justice but for a political agenda, must be held accountable.

Brit Hume Has the PERFECT Response to Clancy Juror's Brag About Putting GIRL POWER Over Justice

Recommended