On Tuesday, three female jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial did a group interview. The trio discussed the ‘lone juror’ and how he couldn’t move past Clancy murdering her three children to arrive at an acquittal. The male juror was clearly under pressure from at least three sides.
Here’s more. (READ)
OMG. Take a second to think about how the single male Lindsay Clancy juror had to go through THIS for 38 HOURS of deliberations.
The jury foreperson even got "excited" when she thought he was going to cave...He didn't.
They look, sound, and are just as CONDESCENDING as we all suspected.
Absolute freaking legend. He held his ground against THIS 🤯
Thanks to the interview, we can now put ourselves in the male juror's shoes and experience what he likely endured through hours and hours of deliberations. (WATCH)
🚨 OMG. Take a second to think about how the single male Lindsay Clancy juror had to go through THIS for 38 HOURS of deliberations
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 9, 2026
The jury foreperson even got "excited" when she thought he was going to cave...
He didn't.
They look, sound, and are just as CONDESCENDING as we… pic.twitter.com/h3HFlSNS4y
Absolutely soul-destroying.
Posters say they believe the women bullied the male juror for not agreeing with them.
They are incredulous that he would find her guilty just because she brutally murdered her children one-by-one.
— Queen-Bee (@kathryn_merriam) September 9, 2026
Exactly right.
— Carolyn McClarnon (@McClarn2) September 9, 2026
He saw the crime scenes, saw she killed her kids.
Wanted justice.
Recommended
They sound like they were bullying him!
— TheSunAlwaysRises (@SunRises4b) September 9, 2026
“they said he wouldn’t listen to the rest of the panel.”
— jamie perkins (@jamieperkins4) September 9, 2026
He was listening – just not doing what they were telling him to.
These ladies sound like they’re not used to hearing ‘No.’
They’re furious that the ‘lone juror’ didn’t bow to their womanly ‘wisdom.’
11-1 deadlock: three Clancy jurors unload on the holdout.
— LindaNY00 (@LokiLinda00) September 9, 2026
Three jurors from Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial spoke out after the mistrial:
🔴Roni Carlson — retired 5th-grade special-needs teacher and foreperson
🔴Paula Devlin — government-contractor work
🔴Kellie Farina — chef… pic.twitter.com/MFk8cfpgCM
(post continues) ...from Plymouth
The Female jurors slammed the lone male holdout juror who refused to side with them. He “completely disregarded” them, “would not interact,” and “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”
The very fact that one lady said he had the hardest time getting off the fact she viciously killed her children shows the state of this horrible women today. Anyone that finds her not guilty is sick and absolutely retarded
— BunnyestOfBuns (Bunny Silver) (@BestestBun99) September 9, 2026
These women’s moral compasses have been utterly destroyed by postmodern Neo-Marxist feminism.
— JackTheRooster 🐓 (@Jack_TheRooster) September 9, 2026
That makes regaining their humanity look like a lost cause.
Some commenters think an all-male jury would find Clancy guilty and send her to prison, not a mental hospital.
New trial with majority male jurors to find Lindsay Guilty of first degree murder! Enough is enough!!!
— Alexandra Levine (@AlexandraLevi20) September 9, 2026
Next jury selection needs to be super aggressive
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 9, 2026
No way she is found guilty even if all the 12 jurors in this case were male . ( 2 of the 3 males in this trial were for not guilty as well )
— Huffinpuff (@huffinpuff123) September 9, 2026
One has to assume that some beta males would be part of the next jury pool. Even an all-male jury would probably end up deadlocked.