Some of the Lindsay Clancy jurors are speaking out today. The consensus is they are unhappy with the lone male juror who held out and caused a hung jury. While they waxed on and on about how brilliant they all were and how dumb the holdout was, Sean Davis of the Federalist found one detail very interesting.
There is something of a major bombshell in that interview that the Karen jurors were too stupid to understand while they were bragging about themselves and trashing the holdout.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 8, 2026
One of the jurors admits that multiple nurses on the jury used their experience and medical… https://t.co/mM7PGvRGWI
Jurors aren't allowed to bring their outside 'expertise' into jury deliberations. That's a no-no.
https://t.co/DCQWgwj0Gh pic.twitter.com/cJYNOvaPR8
— John Curtis (@Johnmcurtis) September 8, 2026
In a just world.
even mentioning the nurses is crazy because who cares. actually lindsay was a nurse. seems like nurses would be biased towards her. https://t.co/64JddZ4fQ9
— fullautoslur (@fullautoslurs) September 8, 2026
If the nurses are experts, then by extension, Lindsay is an expert, too and she killed her kids. That seems worse.
We not only have a women problem, we have a caregiving profession problem. NURSES. Holy crap. https://t.co/78OiygHYyD
— Lori Geishecker (@lorigeishecker) September 8, 2026
It's actually a little terrifying.
I find it so curious, this trial is exposing the absolute insufferable circumstances a lot men experience with manipulative, untruthful, deceitful women.
— Dan Sanchez (Templars.com) 🇻🇦✠ (@DanSanchez) September 8, 2026
The fact that there was only one holdout helps to show how urgently we need a renaissance of masculinity. https://t.co/aklqalBlvZ
Recommended
Honestly, it is terrifying watching how these women behaved.
Iron Law or Woke Projection
— Dan Cotter (@TheDanCotter) September 8, 2026
They accuse the man of not following the instructions, because he wouldn’t do what they wanted, and then they unwittingly admit they were the ones blatantly not following juror instructions. https://t.co/xhCX4IdhFu
Exactly. I thought the jury could only consider evidence presented at trial. No outside research. If a juror has questions about the evidence, it’s supposed to go to the judge, not be answered by another juror https://t.co/CdvLcqIoMB
— Celia Nelson (@cknelsonmd) September 8, 2026
That is how it is supposed to be. Apparently, this jury made their own set of rules.
This man busted caught the Clancy jurors‼️‼️‼️ According to @grok the a juror can apply life experience to their own decision but sharing it to others is grounds for a retrial or a mistrial This proves at the least the nurse jurors went against judges instructions 😳😱 https://t.co/VKS4ObRoMc pic.twitter.com/QbtegX5Nni
— That_Bitch_Rachel™ (@dat_ass_doe_504) September 8, 2026
This is the real reason a mistrial should have been called.
— LibertyJ (@LibertyJen) September 8, 2026
The plot thickens.
Let alone that the idea that a nurse has expertise to really judge toxicology and the issues at hand here is laughable. Oh, and IM A RETIRED TEACHER!!! SO LISTEN TO ME. GTFO here
— Carson Wilcox (@Carsonsig) September 8, 2026
Exactly! When did nurses become toxicologists.
Turns out the only misconduct on the jury was committed by nurses.
— steveyuhas (@steveyuhas) September 8, 2026
Well, would you look at that.