Over the last couple of days we've again seen how the Dem-media circle of life works. In this latest example Democrat Sen. Jon Ossoff decided to try and get the rumor mill swirling when he said this:
Ossoff says that Trump doesn’t want to do his job but wants to “travel with Natalie” pic.twitter.com/aDLMKFeMmR
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 16, 2026
Ossoff slightly backpedaled later, but by then the media had their marching orders, and CNN again proved that actual "journalism" died a long time ago:
Meet Natalie Harp, the aide so close to Trump she once rode in an SUV trunk to accompany him
— Kristen Holmes (@KristenhCNN) August 18, 2026
“As the motorcade idled outside his Trump Tower residence, staffers confronted a more immediate problem: There wasn’t room for Harp, the hyper-loyal aide whose devotion to Trump had…
An "SUV trunk"? Those clowns can't even do Fake News convincingly.
But it got even more embarrassing for CNN when Erin Burnett had Natalie Harp's estranged brother on, who has absolutely no firsthand knowledge of anything. That didn't matter to CNN:
CNN of course is now trying to make Natalie Harp a story they can use to bash Trump.
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) August 19, 2026
They've brought her brother in to help do it.
Erin Burnett is trying her best to get usable soundbites out of him, but he's spaced out and she's having some trouble. pic.twitter.com/8cfigCPa3r
Duuuuude.
It's so obvious what CNN and others in the media are trying to do, but we can always count on Brian Stelter to provide some spin:
Jon Ossoff knew exactly what he was doing by invoking President Trump’s “travel with Natalie” the other day.
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) August 19, 2026
Google searches for Trump’s executive assistant Natalie Harp spiked by 5,000%. News outlets hurried to meet the demand for info... https://t.co/Hzr8iMqF0q
Recommended
"News outlets hurried to meet the demand for info."
Really? CNN's interview with Harp's brother brought with it nothing but baseless claims and anti-Trump rhetoric.
And who cares if it's TRUE? What a savvy smear that was? https://t.co/VO8tuMUOSX
— Tim Graham (@TimJGraham) August 19, 2026
The media aren't "meeting a demand for info," but rather helping Democrats spread their preferred narratives again.
And you think that's good. Because... "journalism." https://t.co/yHAohmsrnB
— jimtreacher.substack.com (@jtLOL) August 19, 2026
Ossoff read what they told him to read because this is the preferred talking point of the monolithic media mouthpieces to combat the effectiveness of Trump's leadership. https://t.co/4leN0oPrzK pic.twitter.com/LCbcKUJOaF
— Heather Champion (@winningatmylife) August 19, 2026
Soon these same people will move on to whatever the Democrats want them to run with next. It's a tiresome but predictable cycle.
*****