Unassigned

Hot take: Fictional characters can’t consent because they don't have 'agency'

Sometimes, there's a take so absurd on Twitter/X that it makes us tilt our heads in confusion. This is one of them. Read this exchange. Names have been mercifully redacted to protect the idiotic:

Advertisement

I mean, wow.

'Gloriously brain melting' is the best way to describe a lot of things we read on Twitter, honestly.

They'll probably have a stroke, honestly.

That jerk.

That's the only outcome of this logic. This writer often says progressivism/wokeism creates a cultural desert, and this is what she means.

Advertisement

That's really how it feels.

They can be cringe. But arguing fictional characters have no agency is even worse.

We honestly don't know. Is there a full moon or something?

Truly magnificent.

Don't try too hard because it'll make your brain hurt.

Advertisement

We giggled. Hard.

So are we.

You called it.

I guess that works.

Some people apparently don't know what 'fictional' means. Or what writing is.

Honestly, it's like modern day Puritans with 100% less joy.

Advertisement

That would be a fascinating read.

Surprised it hasn't already.

Truly, you have given the Internet a gift.

We honestly believe some people aren't capable of this.

So are we.

Advertisement

It really is a jewel.

Yes. Writers will always tell you the characters are the force here, and they are leading the author, not the other way around.

A non-sequitur, but appropriate:

This is so true.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!