The New York Times has published a story analyzing the Georgia election law, and Brit Hume was good enough to provide any would-be readers with a warning:
This piece is argument cloaked as analysis. Ballot security provisions are treated as vote suppression and measures to make voting easier are glossed over. Reader beware. https://t.co/KXWhXVntWP
— Brit Hume (@brithume) April 2, 2021
Advertisement
New York Post columnist Miranda Devine expanded on Hume’s disclaimer:
Reader beware – as with everything printed in the @nytimes and @wapo https://t.co/k7BvjUuQVa
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) April 2, 2021
That’s always a good rule of thumb!
So, standard operating procedure for the NYT
— Piltdown Man (@PiltdownMan2) April 2, 2021
Pretty much.