With the John Durham probe now hitting the “criminal investigation phase, CNN is turning to the experts for analysis. And by “experts” we mean the guy Rep. Mark Meadows mentioned in this tweet:
Seeing Andrew McCabe on CNN analyzing the criminal inquiry into the FBI and DOJ is really quite something
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) October 25, 2019
Guess what CNN didn’t feel it necessary to mention in a disclaimer:
CNN interviewed Andrew McCabe today about developments in the Barr/Durham investigation, and for some reason failed to disclose that McCabe has sued DOJ and is under criminal investigation himself. https://t.co/kYeRfqXurx
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) October 25, 2019
#Headdesk
Yes, people who close track the news and hang out on Twitter already know about McCabe's conflicts of interest.
But are CNN's dozens of other viewers also aware? https://t.co/QZbaR0OlA9
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) October 25, 2019
CNN obviously didn’t feel full disclosure was necessary.
Apples and bananas. Given how many people on the CNN payroll that perpetuated the false and damaging Russia hoax (from within the government and without), perhaps a constant disclaimer chyron should be running. https://t.co/gn05EcuX67
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) October 25, 2019
CNN is indistinguishable from the DNC at this point, and they don’t care who knows it.
CNN should recuse themselves. Maybe to another galaxy.
— slzzpeasy (@slzzpeasy) October 25, 2019
This is . . . . CNN.
— Jim Williams (@WxWilliams) October 25, 2019
And McCabe will be back on CNN very soon — we have no doubt about that.