Wonder what endangered homeland more: prisoner swap or invading Muslim country based on fake intel resulting in tens of thousands of deaths?
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) June 3, 2014
How’s that for “real journalism” from Politico’s Glenn Thrush?
https://twitter.com/JayCaruso/status/473783771851153408
Apparently every action under Obama is now justified because Bush invaded Iraq. Good call, @GlennThrush: https://t.co/UIqYtw5xrY
— (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 3, 2014
Shorter hack of hacks: @GlennThrush : BUSH!
— Pouncing Coder Brad (@bradcundiff) June 3, 2014
https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/473785211952840704
https://twitter.com/Thomasismyuncle/status/473786316719525888
.@Thomasismyuncle @GlennThrush "But…but…but BOOOOOSSHH!! Leave President Boyfriend alone!" <—–What passes for journalism these days.
— Pablo (@Pablo_1791) June 3, 2014
More from Thrush:
I live near Walter Reed. I see the Non Sequiturs in wheelchairs at my mall MT NolteNC: see someone's been shopping at Non Sequiturs R' Us.”
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) June 3, 2014
I don't know if the swap was a good idea. I'm just noting the past positions of the people reflexively bashing it. @AG_Conservative
— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) June 3, 2014
Just noting. Just askin’ questions, man.
.@GlennThrush 1) you don't know the past positions of those people 2) that isn't a position. It's a dumb assertion on an unrelated topic
— (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 3, 2014
.@GlennThrush also, there is no evidence that opposition to swapping 5 senior terrorists for a likely deserter is a reflexive position.
— (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 3, 2014
.@GlennThrush but I get it. There really is no defending Obama on this so you try to switch the topic to Bush. It's a nice strategy.
— (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) June 3, 2014
https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/473828518644965377
Related:
Politico’s Blake Hounshell: Are these five Taliban guys ninjas?
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.