Photo: Here's what the Boston Herald thinks of Rolling Stone

The front page of Thursday’s Boston Herald doesn’t pull any punches about Rolling Stone’s terror glam shot of accused bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

@bostonherald's cover this morning. Couldn't have said it better myself. pic.twitter.com/OEq4Y4aNNf

— Howie Carr (@HowieCarrShow) July 18, 2013

https://twitter.com/jfdulac/status/357822812339179522

No ambivalence here. RT @jfdulac X marks the Rolling Stone cover on the front of today's Boston Herald. Via @newseum. http://t.co/mrEdubHLXa

— Freedom Forum (@1stForAll) July 18, 2013

Well done. RT @richarddeitsch: The @bostonherald responded to Rolling Stone on its front today: http://t.co/OkcMtBgAUr (Via: @Newseum ).

— ROOK (@Rookmatic) July 18, 2013

https://twitter.com/SeeSharpRun/status/357861245417820162

This is awesome RT @richarddeitsch The @bostonherald responded to Rolling Stone on its front today: http://t.co/hMFFPHNgWF (Via: @Newseum ).

— Lanny Foster (@LannyForealster) July 18, 2013

Recommended

Bill Kristol: It’s Perfectly Legitimate to Ask What Job Natalie Harp Is Doing to Serve the Public

Brett T.

Advertisement

Some felt the Herald’s response didn’t adhere to the lofty “traditions of journalism” that Rolling Stone clearly exemplifies with its rock-star treatment of terrorism.

The Boston Herald continues to nurture their lowest common denominator readership. #rollingstone

— Andrew Hall (@LaughPurgatory) July 18, 2013

https://twitter.com/steviesaf/status/357819357105106946

@BuzzFeedNews – a perfect example of why Bostonians don't take the Boston Herald seriously.

— James Wilcox (@sirjameswilcox) July 18, 2013

B-O-O. H-O-O.

Related:

Full Twitchy coverage of Rolling Stone