The front page of Thursday’s Boston Herald doesn’t pull any punches about Rolling Stone’s terror glam shot of accused bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
@bostonherald's cover this morning. Couldn't have said it better myself. pic.twitter.com/OEq4Y4aNNf
— Howie Carr (@HowieCarrShow) July 18, 2013
https://twitter.com/jfdulac/status/357822812339179522
No ambivalence here. RT @jfdulac X marks the Rolling Stone cover on the front of today's Boston Herald. Via @newseum. http://t.co/mrEdubHLXa
— Freedom Forum (@1stForAll) July 18, 2013
Well done. RT @richarddeitsch: The @bostonherald responded to Rolling Stone on its front today: http://t.co/OkcMtBgAUr (Via: @Newseum ).
— ROOK (@Rookmatic) July 18, 2013
https://twitter.com/SeeSharpRun/status/357861245417820162
This is awesome RT @richarddeitsch The @bostonherald responded to Rolling Stone on its front today: http://t.co/hMFFPHNgWF (Via: @Newseum ).
— Lanny Foster (@LannyForealster) July 18, 2013
Some felt the Herald’s response didn’t adhere to the lofty “traditions of journalism” that Rolling Stone clearly exemplifies with its rock-star treatment of terrorism.
The Boston Herald continues to nurture their lowest common denominator readership. #rollingstone
— Andrew Hall (@LaughPurgatory) July 18, 2013
https://twitter.com/steviesaf/status/357819357105106946
@BuzzFeedNews – a perfect example of why Bostonians don't take the Boston Herald seriously.
— James Wilcox (@sirjameswilcox) July 18, 2013
B-O-O. H-O-O.
Related: