Slate’s had a lot of incredible takes over the years, and then there’s this one that argues that children of baby boomers should not have kids if the boomers don’t vote the way the younger generations think they should.
Hey, boomers: No more grandkids until you vote better. https://t.co/DpX3vd9Pmk
— Slate (@Slate) May 24, 2019
We won’t lower your intelligence with the details of the story, just the carnage that resulted from it.
— Coaxed (@PhiloFiles) May 25, 2019
Make babies to own the libs? https://t.co/7vN3p5CwHF
— Carrah (@carrahroy) May 24, 2019
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read. https://t.co/h2sYpjlHym
— AGR (@SpudCouch1) May 25, 2019
Note the article description: “They’ll get behind the Green New Deal in exchange for a giggly little cutie patootie.”
Are they… are they serious? https://t.co/29lCDmTNPV
— Andrew Lynch (@GentlemanRascal) May 25, 2019
Congrats we’ve gotten more stupid https://t.co/6Z8fJjqsc9
— Troll de Blasio (@MrJoshPerry) May 24, 2019
Really didn't think it could get any crazier than the sex strike.
Slate: Hold my beer. https://t.co/DD87PPF0o8
— David Edward 💤 (@_David_Edward) May 25, 2019
Some think this might actually be a good idea for the demographic that is Slate’s readership.
Please do this https://t.co/Bhhf1xo2FT
— Hugh, No Wit (@hughknowit) May 25, 2019
I hope the geniuses who write and agree with articles like this really do follow through on the “threat” https://t.co/MCcoB9JVOi
— Jessica Fletcher (@heckyessica) May 25, 2019
And we all know that the consequence of that will be.
Slate headline in 2035: “Why is Gen ZZ so conservative?” https://t.co/chtpH4OkT9
— Boomieleaks (@notwokieleaks) May 25, 2019
Contrary to the Babylon Bee, this is actually not intended to be satire.