Slate’s had a lot of incredible takes over the years, and then there’s this one that argues that children of baby boomers should not have kids if the boomers don’t vote the way the younger generations think they should.

We won’t lower your intelligence with the details of the story, just the carnage that resulted from it.

Note the article description:  “They’ll get behind the Green New Deal in exchange for a giggly little cutie patootie.”

Some think this might actually be a good idea for the demographic that is Slate’s readership.

And we all know that the consequence of that will be.

Contrary to the Babylon Bee, this is actually not intended to be satire.



‘I am dying’: The Babylon Bee’s response to Snopes fact-checking its story about AOC and the ‘Price is Right’ is FANTASTIC

‘Is this satire?’ Slate hot take about Trump’s ‘impeachable offense’ is a TDS-induced shark jump for the ages

Nick Searcy busts Slate writer who falsely called Gosnell film ‘gory’ — and gives her an impossible task

Slate: Conservative Supreme Court justices ‘just legalized torture’ in ‘appalling’ death penalty opinion