Monday Morning Meme Madness
Duper Bowl: Ed Krassenstein’s ‘Liam Ramos’ Bad Bunny Grammy Hoax Post Gets Boost...
What the Canuck? Confused Public Has Questions About Canadian Olympic Team’s Bizarre Fashi...
Home Alone: Harry Sisson’s Response to Personally Housing Illegal Aliens Is ‘Mi Casa...
Texas Congressman Looney Tune Gene Wu, Shows His Racist Side Too
No to Voter ID: Hakeem Jeffries Tries to Justify Dems Being on Unpopular...
'How Do You Do, Fellow Bad Bunny Fans?', John Kasich Drops Cringeworthy...
Delete Your Account: John Harwood Gets DRAGGED By X for His Nasty-Looking Super...
Senate Republican Leader John Thune Provides a Sneak Peek of the Pregame Flyover
Halftime S***show: Even NFL Players Have NO IDEA Who Bad Bunny Is (Just...
HHS Hands Off Some Gameday Menu Suggestions
Legal Action Launched to Stop Puberty Blocker Experiment ON CHILDREN
Whoa, His Eyes Get BIGGER? Adam Schiff's Reaction to ABC's Jon Karl Pushing...
Narrative OBLITERATED --> Watch Dana Bash Call Hakeem Jeffries Out TO HIS FACE...
'Fire MORE Writers': WAPO's Woke Super Bowl Piece Gets the DRAGGING It Deserves...

Pink misquotes 'anti-feminist' Ayn Rand for International Women's Day #NotThere

So, this just happened in celebration of International Women’s Day:

Advertisement

Really, Pink? Because Ayn Rand isn’t exactly what you’d call a feminist.

Let’s flash-back to when the retailer Forever 21 was forced to pull T-shirts with this very same Rand (mis)quote after feminist anger:

https://twitter.com/alyssabereznak/status/532368560643772417

Here’s the actual quote from Rand’s novel “The Fountainhead” that Pink is referencing:

“Do you mean to tell me that you’re thinking seriously of building that way, when and if you are an architect?”

“Yes.”

“My dear fellow, who will let you?”

“That’s not the point. The point is, who will stop me?”

Advertisement

Yeah. That’s not quite what Pink was going for.

And even better, here’s how the Atlas Society describes Rand’s views on feminism:

Ayn Rand herself rejected the label “feminist” and even went so far as to provocatively declare herself a “male chauvinist.” In addition to her philosophical views per se, she had a view of sexual psychology that ascribed distinctive “masculine” and “feminine” attitudes to healthy men and women respectively. She argued that sexually, women should desire to engage in “hero worship,” and that this required having at least one man to whom they could each look up. For this reason she argued in her essay “About a Woman President” that a women should not want to be the commander-in-chief. However, she was clear to explain in that context that she nevertheless held that ability was not the basic issue: “women are not inferior to men in ability or intelligence…” Neither I nor any Objectivist thinker of note today thinks Rand’s psychological concepts of femininity and masculinity are integral to the philosophy of Objectivism.

Advertisement

What’s sad is the number of people who’ll read this and think Pink is spot-on with her Rand quote. Some examples:

https://twitter.com/pinkalwaysyou/status/574609387370733568

https://twitter.com/pinkslaysyou/status/574655297932902400

Hashtag activism at work.

***

This might not end well: The Clintons have discovered Snapchat… [video, photos]

‘Seriously tone-deaf’: Hillary’s new ‘not there’ Twitter avatar

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement