UK Police Handcuff University Student Who’d Been Stabbed and Later Died After Claim...
'You Are Not Alone': Creator Behind Genius Spencer Pratt Ads Shares Latest and...
Roseanne Barr Says This Dan Bongino Post Added 15 Years to Her Life
Jasmine Crockett’s Dem Party Ditched Her for James Talarico, Now Rants About GOP...
Variety: Stephen Colbert’s Push Into Politics May Have Hurt the Late-Night Format
Report: ‘Bloodbath’ Brewing at NPR Over Federal Funding Cuts
Champagne Communist Hasan Piker Actively Lies to Broke Fans That More Taxes Will...
Seth Abramson Says the Insurrection Never Ended and the Christofascists Won't Stop
Secretary Rubio’s Spanish Video Exposes the Lie: Cuba’s Blackouts Are Made in Havana,...
Taylor Lorenz Declares DoorDash a Necessity Because Zoomers Lack 'Capacity' to Cook
The Love Fest is Over: Ganja Grandma vs. Governor Spanberger in Virginia Pot...
Sen. Patty Murray Butthurt That IRS Is Banned From Investigating Trump Over Past...
‘Bureaucratic Barriers’: LA Mayor Karen Bass Says Her Promise to End Homelessness Hit...
Chris Murphy: If You Lead a Campaign Against Powerful Pedophiles, You Get Drummed...
Bernie Sanders Sounds Like a Defense Attorney for Communist Cuba and Indicted Regime...

Dave French Plays Dumb for Dems' Even Dumber Sedition Stunt

NBC

Golly and shucks! What's so wrong with saying that the military shouldn't follow illegal orders?

What's the thing of when activists do something provocative yet completely manufactured and the media plays along with their charade? For example, this author remembers an incident from years ago when pro-pot activists were on the news, and during the interview, one of the activists lit a joint on camera.

Advertisement

Dutifully, the reporter said that the interviewee was so nervous about being on TV that she just had to light up. The reporter clearly played along with her stunt and implicitly made the case for marijuana legalization.

The same thing is happening here in the context of the six Democrat legislators' 'disobey illegal orders' stunt video.

'What could possibly be wrong with that? It's true!'

OK, sure. But you have to know that it's really just a very thinly veiled message is that Trump is giving illegal orders and that he must be resisted. Sure, they can't outright say it, they need plausible deniability, but anyone who hears that knew exactly what it meant.

David French, who is a lot of things, is not dumb. So this schtick is even more pathetic than the usual engagement slop. 

So one of the New York Times' favorite conservatives (i.e. a conservative who opposes the right and especially Trump) issues his phony 'babe in the woods' naive take.

Advertisement

Let's dissect why French's take is both disingenuous and wrong.

That's how it came across.

You see it, we all see it. Even David French sees it. We're not going to pretend that his TDS blinded him.

We see what you did there, and it's brilliant.

Advertisement

Another fitting analogy. French shrugs, collects the check.

Funny, that.

Seriously. He's gone over to the Dark Side.

  • Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.


Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement